Abstract
Purpose: To explore the cases for and against the use of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) in qualitative organisation and management research.
Design-methodology-approach: Reflecting the debate inherent in the questions raised about the use of CAQDAS, a dialogue between the authors is used.
Findings: There are risks associated with using CAQDAS without considering its underpinning principles and assumptions about data analysis. If these are considered explicitly as part of a research methodology, then CAQDAS may be a valuable analytical tool. If not, there is risk of distortion and bias in results from the use of CAQDAS.
Originality-value: The paper addresses a commonly posed question for qualitative researchers, in a format and structure that is likely to stimulate further debate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-77 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- Epistemology
- Management research
- Qualitative methods
- Qualitative research
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Structuring qualitative enquiry in management and organization research: A dialogue on the merits of using software for qualitative data analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver