Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Subclassification of obesity for precision prediction of cardiometabolic diseases

  • Daniel E. Coral (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Femke Smit (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Ali Farzaneh
  • , Alexander Gieswinkel
  • , Juan Fernandez-Tajes
  • , Thomas Sparso
  • , Carl Delfin
  • , Pierre Bauvain
  • , Kan Wang
  • , Marinella Temprosa
  • , Diederik De Cock
  • , Jordi Blanch
  • , José-Manuel Fernández-Real
  • , Rafael Ramos
  • , M. Kamran Ikram
  • , Maria F Gomez
  • , Maryam Kavousi
  • , Marina Panova-Noeva
  • , Philipp S. Wild
  • , Carla van der Kallen
  • Michiel Adriaens, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Ilja C. W. Arts, Carel W. Le Roux, Fariba Ahmadizar, Timothy M. Frayling, Giuseppe Nicola Giordano, Ewan Pearson, Paul W. Franks (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Obesity and cardiometabolic disease often, but not always, coincide. Distinguishing subpopulations within which cardiometabolic risk diverges from the risk expected for a given body mass index (BMI) may facilitate precision prevention of cardiometabolic diseases. Accordingly, we performed unsupervised clustering in four European population-based cohorts (N ≈ 173,000). We detected five discordant profiles consisting of individuals with cardiometabolic biomarkers higher or lower than expected given their BMI, which generally increases disease risk, in total representing ~20% of the total population. Persons with discordant profiles differed from concordant individuals in prevalence and future risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and type 2 diabetes. Subtle BMI-discordances in biomarkers affected disease risk. For instance, a 10% higher probability of having a discordant lipid profile was associated with a 5% higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio in women 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.06, P = 4.19 × 10 −10; hazard ratio in men 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.04, 1.06, P = 9.33 × 10 −14). Multivariate prediction models for MACE and type 2 diabetes performed better when incorporating discordant profile information (likelihood ratio test P < 0.001). This enhancement represents an additional net benefit of 4−15 additional correct interventions and 37−135 additional unnecessary interventions correctly avoided for every 10,000 individuals tested.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Medicine
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subclassification of obesity for precision prediction of cardiometabolic diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this