Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma: a morphologically distinct entity: a clinicopathologic series of 36 tumors from 27 patients

  • Anthony J. Gill (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Ondrej Hes
  • , Thomas Papathomas
  • , Monika Sedivcová
  • , Puay Hoon Tan
  • , Abbas Agaimy
  • , Per Arne Andresen
  • , Andrew Kedziora
  • , Adele Clarkson
  • , Christopher W. Toon
  • , Loretta Sioson
  • , Nicole Watson
  • , Angela Chou
  • , Julie Paik
  • , Roderick J Clifton-Bligh
  • , Bruce G Robinson
  • , Diana E. Benn
  • , Kirsten Hills
  • , Fiona Maclean
  • , Nicolasine D Niemeijer
  • Ljiljana Vlatkovic, Arndt Hartmann, Eleonora P M Corssmit, Geert J L H van Leenders, Christopher Przybycin, Jesse K McKenney, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Asli Yilmaz, Darryl Yu, Katherine D Nicoll, Jim L Yong, Mathilde Sibony, Evgeny Yakirevich, Stewart Fleming, Chung W Chow, Markku Miettinen, Michal Michal, Kiril Trpkov

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    279 Citations (Scopus)
    649 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma has been accepted as a provisional entity in the 2013 International Society of Urological Pathology Vancouver Classification. To further define its morphologic and clinical features, we studied a multi-institutional cohort of 36 SDH-deficient renal carcinomas from 27 patients, including 21 previously unreported cases. We estimate that 0.05% to 0.2% of all renal carcinomas are SDH deficient. Mean patient age at presentation was 37 years (range, 14 to 76 y), with a slight male predominance (M:F=1.7:1). Bilateral tumors were observed in 26% of patients. Thirty-four (94%) tumors demonstrated the previously reported morphology at least focally, which included: solid or focally cystic growth, uniform cytology with eosinophilic flocculent cytoplasm, intracytoplasmic vacuolations and inclusions, and round to oval low-grade nuclei. All 17 patients who underwent genetic testing for mutation in the SDH subunits demonstrated germline mutations (16 in SDHB and 1 in SDHC). Nine of 27 (33%) patients developed metastatic disease, 2 of them after prolonged follow-up (5.5 and 30 y). Seven of 10 patients (70%) with high-grade nuclei metastasized as did all 4 patients with coagulative necrosis. Two of 17 (12%) patients with low-grade nuclei metastasized, and both had unbiopsied contralateral tumors, which may have been the origin of the metastatic disease. In conclusion, SDH-deficient renal carcinoma is a rare and unique type of renal carcinoma, exhibiting stereotypical morphologic features in the great majority of cases and showing a strong relationship with SDH germline mutation. Although this tumor may undergo dedifferentiation and metastasize, sometimes after a prolonged delay, metastatic disease is rare in the absence of high-grade nuclear atypia or coagulative necrosis.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1588-1602
    Number of pages15
    JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
    Volume38
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma: a morphologically distinct entity: a clinicopathologic series of 36 tumors from 27 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this