Superquestions and some ways to answer them

Giulia D'Agostino (Lead / Corresponding author), Ella Schad, Eimear Maguire, Costanza Lucchinni, Andrea Rocci, Chris Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Earnings Conference Calls, in which corporate management are quizzed by investment analysts, are a particularly rich source of a phenomenon of question-asking that, though less prevalent, also occurs in many other genres of discourse. When a participant in a dialogue is allowed to ask more than one question consecutively– particularly in order to extend or refine or recast– we see that respondents often react by answering either one or more of the individual questions, or by answering a question that was never actually asked, but which is related to the explicit questions and to other content introduced in the turn. We call this overarching implicit question a superquestion, and explore how they can be formed, how they can be answered, how they trigger argumentation, and, indeed, how they can be dodged.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-372
Number of pages54
JournalJournal of Argumentation in Context
Volume13
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Questions
  • Answers
  • Answerhood
  • Financial communication
  • superquestions
  • answerhood
  • argumentation in finance
  • answers
  • questions
  • maximal answering unit
  • superanswers
  • financial communication
  • maximal interrogative unit
  • dialogical interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Superquestions and some ways to answer them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this