Abstract
Earnings Conference Calls, in which corporate management are quizzed by investment analysts, are a particularly rich source of a phenomenon of question-asking that, though less prevalent, also occurs in many other genres of discourse. When a participant in a dialogue is allowed to ask more than one question consecutively– particularly in order to extend or refine or recast– we see that respondents often react by answering either one or more of the individual questions, or by answering a question that was never actually asked, but which is related to the explicit questions and to other content introduced in the turn. We call this overarching implicit question a superquestion, and explore how they can be formed, how they can be answered, how they trigger argumentation, and, indeed, how they can be dodged.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 319-372 |
Number of pages | 54 |
Journal | Journal of Argumentation in Context |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- Questions
- Answers
- Answerhood
- Financial communication
- superquestions
- answerhood
- argumentation in finance
- answers
- questions
- maximal answering unit
- superanswers
- financial communication
- maximal interrogative unit
- dialogical interaction
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language