Symptoms, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma exacerbations in clinical practice

Daniel Menzies, Cathy Jackson, Catrina Mistry, Ruth Houston, Brian J. Lipworth

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Patient symptoms, spirometry measurements, exacerbation rates, and exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) levels have all been used to quantify asthma severity.

    Objective: To determine the relationships among these disease Surrogates in clinical practice.

    Methods: Data were collected from 5 primary care asthma clinics on patient symptoms, reliever use, spirometry measurements, maintenance pharmacotherapy, disease severity (British Thoracic Society treatment step), and FENO level. Exacerbation data (asthma-related unscheduled health care contact or rescue oral corticosteroid therapy) for the 12 months before and 3 months after the clinic visit were then obtained.

    Results: A total of 267 adult asthmatic patients (mean [SEM] age, 51.6 [1.1] years; forced expiratory volurne in 1 second, 86.3% [1.2%] of predicted) participated, and 157 exacerbations were captured. For the 12 months before the clinic visit, exacerbation rate was positively correlated with dose of inhaled corticosteroid (P <.001), treatment step (P <.001), reliever use (P =.002), and symptom score (P <.001) but was negatively correlated with FENO level (P =.04); only symptom scores correlated with exacerbation rate in the 3 months after the visit. Levels of FENO were significantly lower in frequently exacerbating patients receiving higher doses of maintenance inhaled corticosteroids compared with patients with mild disease who were corticosteroid naive (19.7 vs 40.4 ppb, P <.001). Measurement of FENO was an insensitive method (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 51.9% at a cutoff value of 20 ppb) for identifying patients who subsequently exacerbated.

    Conclusion: Levels of FENO are paradoxically decreased in patients with more severe asthma and frequent exacerbations and may, therefore, be of limited utility in primary care.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)248-255
    Number of pages8
    JournalAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
    Volume101
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

    Keywords

    • Randomized controlled trial
    • General practice
    • Mild asthma
    • Children
    • Guide
    • Hyperresponsiveness
    • Morbidity
    • Counts

    Cite this