Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis

S. J. Martin, P. D. Grimwood, R. G. M. Morris

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    2304 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Changing the strength of connections between neurons is widely assumed to be the mechanism by which memory traces are encoded and stored in the central nervous system. In its most general form, the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis states that "activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is induced at appropriate synapses during memory formation and is both necessary and sufficient for the information storage underlying the type of memory mediated by the brain area in which that plasticity is observed." We outline a set of criteria by which this hypothesis can be judged and describe a range of experimental strategies used to investigate it. We review both classical and newly discovered properties of synaptic plasticity and stress the importance of the neural architecture and synaptic learning rules of the network in which it is embedded. The greater part of the article focuses on types of memory mediated by the hippocampus, amygdala, and cortex. We conclude that a wealth of data supports the notion that synaptic plasticity is necessary for learning and memory, but that little data currently supports the notion of sufficiency.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)649-711
    Number of pages63
    JournalAnnual Review of Neuroscience
    Volume23
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2000

    Keywords

    • Amygdala/physiology
    • Animals
    • Evaluation Studies as Topic
    • Hippocampus/physiology
    • Humans
    • Learning/physiology
    • Long-Term Potentiation/physiology
    • Memory/physiology
    • Models, Neurological
    • Neural Pathways/physiology
    • Neuronal Plasticity/physiology
    • Synapses/physiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this