Abstract
This paper takes a retrospective look at Lyotard’s analysis of “the postmodern condition,” a century after his birth, and nearly a half-century since his highly influential book. Lyotard’s pessimistic view was that after the end of metanarratives, there is now no alternative to the liberal democratic capitalist “System,” which is governed by a technological-economic principle of “performativity.” Considering Lyotard’s thesis in the light of his own methodology of “signs of history,” I argue that it is no longer possible to hold this view. A number of key historical events point to massive fault-lines that have appeared in this System. Nevertheless, much of what Lyotard wrote in The Postmodern Condition about the growing influence of technology on social and political life has only been confirmed. The hypothesis this paper proposes is that the signs of system failure might at least open paths of resistance to technological hegemony.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Technophany: A Journal for Philosophy and Technology |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 16 Oct 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Jean-François Lyotard
- postmodern
- political philosophy
- philosophy of technology
- art and technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'System Failure (?)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver