Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

System Failure (?)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper takes a retrospective look at Lyotard’s analysis of “the postmodern condition,” a century after his birth, and nearly a half-century since his highly influential book. Lyotard’s pessimistic view was that after the end of metanarratives, there is now no alternative to the liberal democratic capitalist “System,” which is governed by a technological-economic principle of “performativity.” Considering Lyotard’s thesis in the light of his own methodology of “signs of history,” I argue that it is no longer possible to hold this view. A number of key historical events point to massive fault-lines that have appeared in this System. Nevertheless, much of what Lyotard wrote in The Postmodern Condition about the growing influence of technology on social and political life has only been confirmed. The hypothesis this paper proposes is that the signs of system failure might at least open paths of resistance to technological hegemony.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalTechnophany: A Journal for Philosophy and Technology
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date16 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Jean-François Lyotard
  • postmodern
  • political philosophy
  • philosophy of technology
  • art and technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'System Failure (?)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this