Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine

Daniel Darbyshire (Lead / Corresponding author), Morris Gordon, Paul Baker, Steven Agius, Sean McAleer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
171 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: Academic medicine is a career route that historically struggles to recruit and retain suitable doctors. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine by way of a descriptive systematic review.

Methods: Key databases were searched in February 2017. Studies that evaluated interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine and that used a pre-post analysis or included a comparison group were included. Interventions reporting only learner satisfaction were excluded. The review was specific to medical students and graduates.

Results: Twenty-four studies were identified for inclusion within the review. The included studies identified interventions across five domains: postgraduate funding, postgraduate training, mentoring, undergraduate interventions, and institutional change. The papers varied in terms of strength of conclusion and method of analysis with broad, structured, well-funded programs having the most palpable results.

Conclusions: The five domains identified offer a framework that can be used by institutions who wish to develop similar programs. It also offers a body of research on which an evidence base can be built.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-67
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

career
medicine
institutional change
mentoring
evidence
medical student
funding
inclusion
graduate
Group

Cite this

Darbyshire, Daniel ; Gordon, Morris ; Baker, Paul ; Agius, Steven ; McAleer, Sean. / Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine. In: Medical Teacher. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 61-67.
@article{68e7a60a3a894fffa305f9f2e5350ff1,
title = "Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine",
abstract = "Aims: Academic medicine is a career route that historically struggles to recruit and retain suitable doctors. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine by way of a descriptive systematic review.Methods: Key databases were searched in February 2017. Studies that evaluated interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine and that used a pre-post analysis or included a comparison group were included. Interventions reporting only learner satisfaction were excluded. The review was specific to medical students and graduates.Results: Twenty-four studies were identified for inclusion within the review. The included studies identified interventions across five domains: postgraduate funding, postgraduate training, mentoring, undergraduate interventions, and institutional change. The papers varied in terms of strength of conclusion and method of analysis with broad, structured, well-funded programs having the most palpable results.Conclusions: The five domains identified offer a framework that can be used by institutions who wish to develop similar programs. It also offers a body of research on which an evidence base can be built.",
author = "Daniel Darbyshire and Morris Gordon and Paul Baker and Steven Agius and Sean McAleer",
note = "No funding info",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2018.1438590",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "61--67",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine. / Darbyshire, Daniel (Lead / Corresponding author); Gordon, Morris; Baker, Paul; Agius, Steven; McAleer, Sean.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 41, No. 1, 28.02.2018, p. 61-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine

AU - Darbyshire, Daniel

AU - Gordon, Morris

AU - Baker, Paul

AU - Agius, Steven

AU - McAleer, Sean

N1 - No funding info

PY - 2018/2/28

Y1 - 2018/2/28

N2 - Aims: Academic medicine is a career route that historically struggles to recruit and retain suitable doctors. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine by way of a descriptive systematic review.Methods: Key databases were searched in February 2017. Studies that evaluated interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine and that used a pre-post analysis or included a comparison group were included. Interventions reporting only learner satisfaction were excluded. The review was specific to medical students and graduates.Results: Twenty-four studies were identified for inclusion within the review. The included studies identified interventions across five domains: postgraduate funding, postgraduate training, mentoring, undergraduate interventions, and institutional change. The papers varied in terms of strength of conclusion and method of analysis with broad, structured, well-funded programs having the most palpable results.Conclusions: The five domains identified offer a framework that can be used by institutions who wish to develop similar programs. It also offers a body of research on which an evidence base can be built.

AB - Aims: Academic medicine is a career route that historically struggles to recruit and retain suitable doctors. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine by way of a descriptive systematic review.Methods: Key databases were searched in February 2017. Studies that evaluated interventions to encourage careers in academic medicine and that used a pre-post analysis or included a comparison group were included. Interventions reporting only learner satisfaction were excluded. The review was specific to medical students and graduates.Results: Twenty-four studies were identified for inclusion within the review. The included studies identified interventions across five domains: postgraduate funding, postgraduate training, mentoring, undergraduate interventions, and institutional change. The papers varied in terms of strength of conclusion and method of analysis with broad, structured, well-funded programs having the most palpable results.Conclusions: The five domains identified offer a framework that can be used by institutions who wish to develop similar programs. It also offers a body of research on which an evidence base can be built.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042940807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1438590

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1438590

M3 - Article

C2 - 29490555

VL - 41

SP - 61

EP - 67

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 1

ER -