Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy

V. Shanmugam, M. A. Thaha, K. S. Rabindranath, K. L. Campbell, R. J. C. Steele, M. A. Loudon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background and method: This review compares the two most popular treatments for haemorrhoids, namely rubber band ligation (RBL) and excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Randomized trials were identified from the major electronic databases. Symptom control, retreatment, postoperative pain, complications, time off work and patient satisfaction were assessed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference with 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) were estimated using a random-effects model for dichotomous and continuous outcomes respectively.
    Results: Three trials met the inclusion criteria and all were of poor methodological quality. Complete remission of haemorrhoidal symptoms was better after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 1.68 (95 per cent c.i 1.00 to 2.83)). There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 90.5 per cent; P <0.001). Fewer patients required retreatment after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 0.20 (95 per cent c.i 0.09 to 0.40)), but anal stenosis, postoperative haemorrhage and incontinence to flatus were more common with this operation.
    Conclusions: Haemorrhoidectomy produced better long-term symptom control in patients with grade III haemorrhoids, but was associated with more postoperative complications than RBL.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1481-1487
    Number of pages7
    JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
    Volume92
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this