Taking pluralism seriously: embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems

Jesse Dillard, Robin Roslender

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Professor Norman Macintosh has long been a leading, and at times a dissonant, voice in critical accounting studies, exhibiting an intellectual dexterity seldom encountered in the accounting academy. His work ranges from the application of traditional organizational theories within work organizations to poststructural renderings of capital market exigencies. Here, we consider and extend Professor Macintosh's work contemplating the morality embedded within, and propagated by, management accounting and control systems (macs). We begin with Macintosh (1995) employing structuration theory in investigating the ethics of profit manipulation within large, decentralized corporations. The work highlights the fundamental dialectical contradictions within these work organizations, demonstrates the indeterminacy of traditional ethical reasoning, and shows the extent to which macs provide legitimating underpinnings for management action. We propose to extend the conversation using the tools provided in Macintosh's subsequent work: a Levinasian ethic (Macintosh et al., 2009), and heteroglossic accounting (Macintosh, 2002)—both emerging from his poststructuralist predilections. A Levinasian perspective provides an ontologically grounded ethic, and heteroglossic accounting calls for multiple accountings representing alternative moral voices. A critical dialogic framework is proposed as a theoretic for imagining heteroglossic accounting that takes pluralism seriously by recognizing the reality of irresolvable differences and asymmetric power relationships associated with assorted moral perspectives.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)135-147
    Number of pages13
    JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

    Fingerprint

    pluralism
    control system
    morality
    management
    moral philosophy
    university teacher
    structuration
    capital market
    Morality
    Pluralism
    Management accounting systems
    Management control systems
    academy
    manipulation
    corporation
    profit
    conversation
    Work organization
    Structuration theory
    Ethical reasoning

    Keywords

    • Agonistic pluralism
    • Ethics
    • Heteroglossic accounting
    • Levinas
    • Structuration theory

    Cite this

    @article{a3f38ea4231a48578203e8fe47301dbf,
    title = "Taking pluralism seriously: embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems",
    abstract = "Professor Norman Macintosh has long been a leading, and at times a dissonant, voice in critical accounting studies, exhibiting an intellectual dexterity seldom encountered in the accounting academy. His work ranges from the application of traditional organizational theories within work organizations to poststructural renderings of capital market exigencies. Here, we consider and extend Professor Macintosh's work contemplating the morality embedded within, and propagated by, management accounting and control systems (macs). We begin with Macintosh (1995) employing structuration theory in investigating the ethics of profit manipulation within large, decentralized corporations. The work highlights the fundamental dialectical contradictions within these work organizations, demonstrates the indeterminacy of traditional ethical reasoning, and shows the extent to which macs provide legitimating underpinnings for management action. We propose to extend the conversation using the tools provided in Macintosh's subsequent work: a Levinasian ethic (Macintosh et al., 2009), and heteroglossic accounting (Macintosh, 2002)—both emerging from his poststructuralist predilections. A Levinasian perspective provides an ontologically grounded ethic, and heteroglossic accounting calls for multiple accountings representing alternative moral voices. A critical dialogic framework is proposed as a theoretic for imagining heteroglossic accounting that takes pluralism seriously by recognizing the reality of irresolvable differences and asymmetric power relationships associated with assorted moral perspectives.",
    keywords = "Agonistic pluralism, Ethics, Heteroglossic accounting, Levinas, Structuration theory",
    author = "Jesse Dillard and Robin Roslender",
    note = "dc.publisher: Elsevier",
    year = "2011",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "135--147",
    journal = "Critical Perspectives on Accounting",
    issn = "1045-2354",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "2",

    }

    Taking pluralism seriously: embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems. / Dillard, Jesse; Roslender, Robin.

    In: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 22, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 135-147.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Taking pluralism seriously: embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems

    AU - Dillard, Jesse

    AU - Roslender, Robin

    N1 - dc.publisher: Elsevier

    PY - 2011/2

    Y1 - 2011/2

    N2 - Professor Norman Macintosh has long been a leading, and at times a dissonant, voice in critical accounting studies, exhibiting an intellectual dexterity seldom encountered in the accounting academy. His work ranges from the application of traditional organizational theories within work organizations to poststructural renderings of capital market exigencies. Here, we consider and extend Professor Macintosh's work contemplating the morality embedded within, and propagated by, management accounting and control systems (macs). We begin with Macintosh (1995) employing structuration theory in investigating the ethics of profit manipulation within large, decentralized corporations. The work highlights the fundamental dialectical contradictions within these work organizations, demonstrates the indeterminacy of traditional ethical reasoning, and shows the extent to which macs provide legitimating underpinnings for management action. We propose to extend the conversation using the tools provided in Macintosh's subsequent work: a Levinasian ethic (Macintosh et al., 2009), and heteroglossic accounting (Macintosh, 2002)—both emerging from his poststructuralist predilections. A Levinasian perspective provides an ontologically grounded ethic, and heteroglossic accounting calls for multiple accountings representing alternative moral voices. A critical dialogic framework is proposed as a theoretic for imagining heteroglossic accounting that takes pluralism seriously by recognizing the reality of irresolvable differences and asymmetric power relationships associated with assorted moral perspectives.

    AB - Professor Norman Macintosh has long been a leading, and at times a dissonant, voice in critical accounting studies, exhibiting an intellectual dexterity seldom encountered in the accounting academy. His work ranges from the application of traditional organizational theories within work organizations to poststructural renderings of capital market exigencies. Here, we consider and extend Professor Macintosh's work contemplating the morality embedded within, and propagated by, management accounting and control systems (macs). We begin with Macintosh (1995) employing structuration theory in investigating the ethics of profit manipulation within large, decentralized corporations. The work highlights the fundamental dialectical contradictions within these work organizations, demonstrates the indeterminacy of traditional ethical reasoning, and shows the extent to which macs provide legitimating underpinnings for management action. We propose to extend the conversation using the tools provided in Macintosh's subsequent work: a Levinasian ethic (Macintosh et al., 2009), and heteroglossic accounting (Macintosh, 2002)—both emerging from his poststructuralist predilections. A Levinasian perspective provides an ontologically grounded ethic, and heteroglossic accounting calls for multiple accountings representing alternative moral voices. A critical dialogic framework is proposed as a theoretic for imagining heteroglossic accounting that takes pluralism seriously by recognizing the reality of irresolvable differences and asymmetric power relationships associated with assorted moral perspectives.

    KW - Agonistic pluralism

    KW - Ethics

    KW - Heteroglossic accounting

    KW - Levinas

    KW - Structuration theory

    U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014

    DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 135

    EP - 147

    JO - Critical Perspectives on Accounting

    JF - Critical Perspectives on Accounting

    SN - 1045-2354

    IS - 2

    ER -