Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

Nuria Vives, Gemma Binefa, Noemie Travier, Albert Farre, Jon Aritz Panera, Berta Casas, Carmen Vidal, Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz, Montse Garcia (Lead / Corresponding author), M-TICS research group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Mobile phone SMS text message reminders have shown moderate effects in improving participation rates in ongoing colorectal cancer screening programs.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of SMS text messages as a replacement for routine postal reminders in a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain.

METHODS:

We conducted a randomized controlled trial among individuals aged 50 to 69 years who were invited to screening but had not completed their fecal immunochemical test within 6 weeks. The intervention group (n=12,167) received an SMS text message reminder, while the control group (n=12,221) followed the standard procedure of receiving a reminder letter. The primary outcome was participation within 18 weeks of the invitation. The trial was stopped early, and a recovery strategy was implemented for nonparticipants in the intervention group. We performed a final analysis to evaluate the impact of the recovery strategy on the main outcome of the trial. Participation was assessed using a logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders (sex, age, and deprivation score index) globally and by screening behavior.

RESULTS:

The trial was discontinued early in September 2022 due to the results of the interim analysis. The interim analysis included 5570 individuals who had completed 18 weeks of follow-up (intention-to-treat). The SMS text message group had a participation rate of 17.2% (477/2781), whereas the control group had a participation rate of 21.9% (610/2789; odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82; P<.001). As a recovery strategy, 7591 (72.7%) out of 10,442 nonparticipants in the SMS text message group had an open screening episode and received a second reminder by letter, reaching a participation rate of 23% (1748/7591). The final analysis (N=24,388) showed a participation rate of 29.3% (3561/12,167) in the intervention group, which received 2 reminders, while the participation rate was 26.5% (3235/12,221) in the control group (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Replacing SMS text messages with reminder letters did not increase the participation rate but also led to a decline in participation among nonparticipants 6 weeks after the invitation. However, sending a second reminder by letter significantly increased participation rates among nonparticipants within 6 weeks in the SMS text message group compared with those who received 1 postal reminder (control group). Additional research is essential to determine the best timing and frequency of reminders to boost participation without being intrusive in their choice of participation. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04343950, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04343950 (04/09/2020).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere64243
Number of pages26
JournalJMIR mHealth and uHealth
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Text messaging
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Mass Screening/methods
  • Reminder Systems/statistics & numerical data
  • Postal Service/statistics & numerical data
  • Randomised Controlled Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this