Abstract
Whilst different areas of argumentation theory might focus upon different phenomena, or offer competing accounts, there is unspoken consensus that foundational features such as linked-ness, convergence and even support or attack should be reliably distinguishable in the wild. After detailed analysis of more than ten thousand arguments in the QT30 corpus (Hautli-Janisz et al. 2022a, b), it seems as though this consensus view is false, challenging fundamental notions of descriptive adequacy from across argumentation theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation |
Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
Publisher | Sic Sat |
Pages | 796-812 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Event | 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023) - Leiden University , Leiden, Netherlands Duration: 4 Jul 2023 → 7 Jul 2023 Conference number: 10 https://ilias-argumentation.com/issa/ |
Conference
Conference | 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2023) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ISSA 2023 |
Country/Territory | Netherlands |
City | Leiden |
Period | 4/07/23 → 7/07/23 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- annotator disagreement
- argument analysis
- theoretical foundations