The Association Between Bronchiectasis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)

Eva Polverino, Anthony De Soyza, Katerina Dimakou, Letizia Traversi, Apostolos Bossios, Megan L. Crichton, Felix C. Ringshausen, Montserrat Vendrell, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Charles S. Haworth, Michael R. Loebinger, Natalie Lorent, Isabell Pink, Melissa McDonnell, Sabina Skrgat, Luis M. Carro, Oriol Sibila, Menno van der Eerden, Paula Kauppi, Amelia ShoemarkAdelina Amorim, Jeremy S. Brown, John R. Hurst, Marc Miravitlles, Rosario Menendez, Antoni Torres, Tobias Welte, Francesco Blasi, Josje Altenburg, Michal Shteinberg, Wim Boersma, Stuart J. Elborn, Pieter C. Goeminne, Stefano Aliberti, James D. Chalmers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Rationale: COPD and bronchiectasis are commonly reported together. Studies report varying impacts of co-diagnosis on outcomes, which may be related to different definitions of disease used across studies. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with bronchiectasis and its relationship with clinical outcomes. We further investigated the impact of implementing the standardized ROSE criteria (radiological bronchiectasis [R], obstruction [FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7; O], symptoms [S], and exposure [⩾10 pack-years of smoking; E]), an objective definition of the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Methods: Analysis of the EMBARC (European Bronchiectasis Registry), a prospective observational study of patients with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis from 28 countries. The ROSE criteria were used to objectively define the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Key outcomes during a maximum of 5 years of follow-up were exacerbations, hospitalization, and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 16,730 patients with bronchiectasis were included; 4,336 had a clinician-assigned codiagnosis of COPD, and these patients had more exacerbations, worse quality of life, and higher severity scores. We observed marked overdiagnosis of COPD: 22.2% of patients with a diagnosis of COPD did not have airflow obstruction and 31.9% did not have a history of ⩾10 pack-years of smoking. Therefore, 2,157 patients (55.4%) met the ROSE criteria for COPD. Compared with patients without COPD, patients who met the ROSE criteria had increased risks of exacerbations and exacerbations resulting in hospitalization during follow-up (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.35; vs. incidence rate ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.90, respectively). Conclusions: The label of COPD is often applied to patients with bronchiectasis who do not have objective evidence of airflow obstruction or a smoking history. Patients with a clinical label of COPD have worse clinical outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)119-127
    Number of pages9
    JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
    Volume210
    Issue number1
    Early online date25 Jan 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

    Keywords

    • COPD
    • bronchiectasis
    • exacerbations
    • mortality
    • spirometry

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
    • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Association Between Bronchiectasis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this