The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries: data protection and power asymmetry

Ethem Ilbiz, Christian Kaunert (Lead / Corresponding author), Dimitrios Anagnostakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
155 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-984
Number of pages18
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume29
Issue number6
Early online date4 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Europol
third countries
data protection
Data privacy
asymmetry
data exchange
Electronic data interchange
Morocco
Turkey
pragmatics
flexibility
EU
European Union

Keywords

  • Counterterrorism
  • Data protection rules
  • Europol
  • Morocco
  • Power asymmetry
  • Turkey
  • United States

Cite this

Ilbiz, Ethem ; Kaunert, Christian ; Anagnostakis, Dimitrios. / The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries : data protection and power asymmetry. In: Terrorism and Political Violence. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 967-984.
@article{e4bb136e5dc5403abf272ff9afc985d0,
title = "The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries: data protection and power asymmetry",
abstract = "This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.",
keywords = "Counterterrorism, Data protection rules, Europol, Morocco, Power asymmetry, Turkey, United States",
author = "Ethem Ilbiz and Christian Kaunert and Dimitrios Anagnostakis",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 Taylor & Francis",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "967--984",
journal = "Terrorism and Political Violence",
issn = "0954-6553",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries : data protection and power asymmetry. / Ilbiz, Ethem; Kaunert, Christian (Lead / Corresponding author); Anagnostakis, Dimitrios.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 29, No. 6, 02.11.2017, p. 967-984.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries

T2 - data protection and power asymmetry

AU - Ilbiz, Ethem

AU - Kaunert, Christian

AU - Anagnostakis, Dimitrios

N1 - © 2015 Taylor & Francis

PY - 2017/11/2

Y1 - 2017/11/2

N2 - This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.

AB - This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.

KW - Counterterrorism

KW - Data protection rules

KW - Europol

KW - Morocco

KW - Power asymmetry

KW - Turkey

KW - United States

U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438

DO - 10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84946430368

VL - 29

SP - 967

EP - 984

JO - Terrorism and Political Violence

JF - Terrorism and Political Violence

SN - 0954-6553

IS - 6

ER -