TY - CHAP
T1 - The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance
T2 - reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK
AU - Arts, Jos
AU - Runhaar, Hens A. C.
AU - Fischer, Thomas B.
AU - Jha-Thakur, Urmila
AU - Van Laerhoven, Frank
AU - Driessen, Peter P. J.
AU - Onyango, Vincent
PY - 2016/2
Y1 - 2016/2
N2 - The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.
AB - The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.
KW - Strategic environmental assessment
KW - Environmental assessment
KW - SEA
UR - http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/p1047#t=aboutBook
UR - http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/search?isn=9781783268375%20&rn=1
U2 - 10.1142/9781783268382_0009
DO - 10.1142/9781783268382_0009
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9781783268375
SP - 171
EP - 210
BT - Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice
A2 - Fischer, Thomas B.
PB - Imperial College Press
CY - London
ER -