The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance

reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK

Jos Arts, Hens A. C. Runhaar, Thomas B. Fischer (Lead / Corresponding author), Urmila Jha-Thakur, Frank Van Laerhoven, Peter P. J. Driessen, Vincent Onyango

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.


Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProgress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice
EditorsThomas B. Fischer
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherImperial College Press
Pages171-210
Number of pages30
ISBN (Electronic)9781783268399
ISBN (Print)9781783268375
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Fingerprint

environmental impact
Netherlands
governance
decision making
online survey
evidence
Values
literature

Keywords

  • Strategic environmental assessment
  • Environmental assessment
  • SEA

Cite this

Arts, J., Runhaar, H. A. C., Fischer, T. B., Jha-Thakur, U., Van Laerhoven, F., Driessen, P. P. J., & Onyango, V. (2016). The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. In T. B. Fischer (Ed.), Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice (pp. 171-210). London: Imperial College Press. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781783268382_0009
Arts, Jos ; Runhaar, Hens A. C. ; Fischer, Thomas B. ; Jha-Thakur, Urmila ; Van Laerhoven, Frank ; Driessen, Peter P. J. ; Onyango, Vincent. / The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance : reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice. editor / Thomas B. Fischer. London : Imperial College Press, 2016. pp. 171-210
@inbook{383a4aef0a89498b9fd07f9ad531ef34,
title = "The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK",
abstract = "The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.",
keywords = "Strategic environmental assessment, Environmental assessment, SEA",
author = "Jos Arts and Runhaar, {Hens A. C.} and Fischer, {Thomas B.} and Urmila Jha-Thakur and {Van Laerhoven}, Frank and Driessen, {Peter P. J.} and Vincent Onyango",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1142/9781783268382_0009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781783268375",
pages = "171--210",
editor = "Fischer, {Thomas B.}",
booktitle = "Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice",
publisher = "Imperial College Press",

}

Arts, J, Runhaar, HAC, Fischer, TB, Jha-Thakur, U, Van Laerhoven, F, Driessen, PPJ & Onyango, V 2016, The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. in TB Fischer (ed.), Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice. Imperial College Press, London, pp. 171-210. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781783268382_0009

The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance : reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. / Arts, Jos; Runhaar, Hens A. C.; Fischer, Thomas B. (Lead / Corresponding author); Jha-Thakur, Urmila; Van Laerhoven, Frank; Driessen, Peter P. J.; Onyango, Vincent.

Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice. ed. / Thomas B. Fischer. London : Imperial College Press, 2016. p. 171-210.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance

T2 - reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK

AU - Arts, Jos

AU - Runhaar, Hens A. C.

AU - Fischer, Thomas B.

AU - Jha-Thakur, Urmila

AU - Van Laerhoven, Frank

AU - Driessen, Peter P. J.

AU - Onyango, Vincent

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.

AB - The European Union (EU) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive which was introduced some 25 years ago has had a major impact on decision-making practices in EU member states. In the professional literature, this impact has mostly been discussed under the heading of “effectiveness”, with an emphasis being given in particular to procedural elements. The extent to which EIA has contributed to objectives, such as raising environmental awareness and leading to an incorporation of environmental values in decisionmaking has only been rarely investigated. This paper reflects on these latter two aspects of EIA effectiveness in two EU member states: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Empirical evidence was compiled mainly on the basis of a comprehensive literature review and online surveys with EIA professionals in both countries. Our results indicate that overall the instrument is about equally effective in both countries with regards to the incorporation of environmental concerns in decision-making. As both countries have different governance mechanisms, further research is needed on why perceived effectiveness does not differ more.

KW - Strategic environmental assessment

KW - Environmental assessment

KW - SEA

UR - http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/p1047#t=aboutBook

UR - http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/search?isn=9781783268375%20&rn=1

U2 - 10.1142/9781783268382_0009

DO - 10.1142/9781783268382_0009

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781783268375

SP - 171

EP - 210

BT - Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice

A2 - Fischer, Thomas B.

PB - Imperial College Press

CY - London

ER -

Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ et al. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. In Fischer TB, editor, Progress in Environmental Assessment Policy, and Management Theory in Practice. London: Imperial College Press. 2016. p. 171-210 https://doi.org/10.1142/9781783268382_0009