Abstract
Among various methods of learning and teaching, educational games are tools that engage students for both educational purposes and entertainment. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of game-based learning (GBL) for undergraduate obstetrics and gynecology students in the form of a gamebook. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to compare the outcomes of two different teaching methods, conventional case-based learning (CBL) and GBL, on undergraduate medical students from Taylor’s University, Malaysia. A statistical analysis was performed to compare the performance between the control and intervention groups. Single-best-answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were used to assess students’ knowledge and understanding of the clinical subject content, and a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess students’ perception of the new teaching method. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the mean academic performance of the two groups of 128 participants. There was no significant difference in the post-intervention MCQ scores. Students in the GBL group found that learning is more enjoyable and felt more confident in managing patients both theoretically and in real world situations. In conclusion, GBL is comparable to conventional CBL in achieving the desired knowledge and understanding of the topics with a more positive perception towards GBL.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 79-90 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Education in Medicine Journal |
Volume | 16 |
Early online date | 31 Jul 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 31 Jul 2024 |
Keywords
- Conventional teaching-learning
- Game-based learning
- Medical student
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Undergraduate MBBS
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Education
- Health Professions (miscellaneous)
- Nursing (miscellaneous)