The effects of recent austerity on environmental protection decisions: evidence and perspectives from Scotland

Vincent Onyango, Paola Gazzola, Geoffrey Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to establish the evidence for, the why and how recent austerity policy atmosphere associated with the UK government affected environmental protection decisions within planning in Scotland.

Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative analysis based on perspectives gathered via questionnaire survey targeted at stakeholders involved in planning in Scotland was undertaken. The questionnaire responses were analysed thematically, supplemented by using statistical tests of significance and variance to show how responses differed across participants.

Findings: The evidence showed that austerity policy atmosphere resulted in a pervasive neoliberal imperative of resuscitating the economy; whilst producing subtle and adverse effects on environmental decisions. This was best understood within a neo-Gramscian perspective of hegemony, borrowed from the field of political economy of states.

Research limitations/implications: The gathered views were constrained within unknown biases that the participants may have had; and because the case study approach was not equipped to generalise the results beyond the study, more research testing cause-effect between the austerity and selected environmental parameters is needed, from various contexts.

Practical implications: Decision-making frameworks should explicitly acknowledge the unique pressures during austerity periods; and contemplate resilient decision-making frameworks that can withstand the hegemonic tendencies which prioritise economic goals above environmental ones.

Originality/value: Whilst the area of austerity’s impacts on the environment remains poorly evidenced, empirically, this seminal paper uses robust analysis to establish how the austerity policy atmosphere affects environmental decisions. This is insight into what may be happening in other similar situations outside Scotland, raising concern as to whether and how we should approach the challenge of hegemonic ideas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1218-1234
Number of pages17
JournalManagement of Environmental Quality: an International Journal
Volume30
Issue number5
Early online date28 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Conservation of Natural Resources
Scotland
Environmental protection
Atmosphere
environmental protection
Decision making
Planning
atmosphere
Statistical tests
Decision Making
decision making
hegemony
qualitative analysis
questionnaire survey
political economy
Research
Economics
Testing
stakeholder
Pressure

Keywords

  • Austerity
  • Environmental decisions
  • Environmental impacts
  • Neo-Gramscian perspective
  • Scotland
  • Stakeholder views

Cite this

@article{d04646d5f10c4619bd6cecdc6fbb95a8,
title = "The effects of recent austerity on environmental protection decisions: evidence and perspectives from Scotland",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to establish the evidence for, the why and how recent austerity policy atmosphere associated with the UK government affected environmental protection decisions within planning in Scotland.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative analysis based on perspectives gathered via questionnaire survey targeted at stakeholders involved in planning in Scotland was undertaken. The questionnaire responses were analysed thematically, supplemented by using statistical tests of significance and variance to show how responses differed across participants.Findings: The evidence showed that austerity policy atmosphere resulted in a pervasive neoliberal imperative of resuscitating the economy; whilst producing subtle and adverse effects on environmental decisions. This was best understood within a neo-Gramscian perspective of hegemony, borrowed from the field of political economy of states.Research limitations/implications: The gathered views were constrained within unknown biases that the participants may have had; and because the case study approach was not equipped to generalise the results beyond the study, more research testing cause-effect between the austerity and selected environmental parameters is needed, from various contexts.Practical implications: Decision-making frameworks should explicitly acknowledge the unique pressures during austerity periods; and contemplate resilient decision-making frameworks that can withstand the hegemonic tendencies which prioritise economic goals above environmental ones.Originality/value: Whilst the area of austerity’s impacts on the environment remains poorly evidenced, empirically, this seminal paper uses robust analysis to establish how the austerity policy atmosphere affects environmental decisions. This is insight into what may be happening in other similar situations outside Scotland, raising concern as to whether and how we should approach the challenge of hegemonic ideas.",
keywords = "Austerity, Environmental decisions, Environmental impacts, Neo-Gramscian perspective, Scotland, Stakeholder views",
author = "Vincent Onyango and Paola Gazzola and Geoffrey Wood",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/MEQ-01-2019-0025",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1218--1234",
journal = "Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal",
issn = "1477-7835",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "5",

}

The effects of recent austerity on environmental protection decisions : evidence and perspectives from Scotland. / Onyango, Vincent; Gazzola, Paola; Wood, Geoffrey.

In: Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal, Vol. 30, No. 5, 05.08.2019, p. 1218-1234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of recent austerity on environmental protection decisions

T2 - evidence and perspectives from Scotland

AU - Onyango, Vincent

AU - Gazzola, Paola

AU - Wood, Geoffrey

PY - 2019/8/5

Y1 - 2019/8/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to establish the evidence for, the why and how recent austerity policy atmosphere associated with the UK government affected environmental protection decisions within planning in Scotland.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative analysis based on perspectives gathered via questionnaire survey targeted at stakeholders involved in planning in Scotland was undertaken. The questionnaire responses were analysed thematically, supplemented by using statistical tests of significance and variance to show how responses differed across participants.Findings: The evidence showed that austerity policy atmosphere resulted in a pervasive neoliberal imperative of resuscitating the economy; whilst producing subtle and adverse effects on environmental decisions. This was best understood within a neo-Gramscian perspective of hegemony, borrowed from the field of political economy of states.Research limitations/implications: The gathered views were constrained within unknown biases that the participants may have had; and because the case study approach was not equipped to generalise the results beyond the study, more research testing cause-effect between the austerity and selected environmental parameters is needed, from various contexts.Practical implications: Decision-making frameworks should explicitly acknowledge the unique pressures during austerity periods; and contemplate resilient decision-making frameworks that can withstand the hegemonic tendencies which prioritise economic goals above environmental ones.Originality/value: Whilst the area of austerity’s impacts on the environment remains poorly evidenced, empirically, this seminal paper uses robust analysis to establish how the austerity policy atmosphere affects environmental decisions. This is insight into what may be happening in other similar situations outside Scotland, raising concern as to whether and how we should approach the challenge of hegemonic ideas.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to establish the evidence for, the why and how recent austerity policy atmosphere associated with the UK government affected environmental protection decisions within planning in Scotland.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative analysis based on perspectives gathered via questionnaire survey targeted at stakeholders involved in planning in Scotland was undertaken. The questionnaire responses were analysed thematically, supplemented by using statistical tests of significance and variance to show how responses differed across participants.Findings: The evidence showed that austerity policy atmosphere resulted in a pervasive neoliberal imperative of resuscitating the economy; whilst producing subtle and adverse effects on environmental decisions. This was best understood within a neo-Gramscian perspective of hegemony, borrowed from the field of political economy of states.Research limitations/implications: The gathered views were constrained within unknown biases that the participants may have had; and because the case study approach was not equipped to generalise the results beyond the study, more research testing cause-effect between the austerity and selected environmental parameters is needed, from various contexts.Practical implications: Decision-making frameworks should explicitly acknowledge the unique pressures during austerity periods; and contemplate resilient decision-making frameworks that can withstand the hegemonic tendencies which prioritise economic goals above environmental ones.Originality/value: Whilst the area of austerity’s impacts on the environment remains poorly evidenced, empirically, this seminal paper uses robust analysis to establish how the austerity policy atmosphere affects environmental decisions. This is insight into what may be happening in other similar situations outside Scotland, raising concern as to whether and how we should approach the challenge of hegemonic ideas.

KW - Austerity

KW - Environmental decisions

KW - Environmental impacts

KW - Neo-Gramscian perspective

KW - Scotland

KW - Stakeholder views

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068366847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MEQ-01-2019-0025

DO - 10.1108/MEQ-01-2019-0025

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1218

EP - 1234

JO - Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal

JF - Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal

SN - 1477-7835

IS - 5

ER -