The Enigma of Fianna Fail: Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

During the 1997 general election campaign in Ireland, the deputy leader of Fianna Fáil, Mary O’Rourke, told a seminar on unemployment organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions that her party had more in common with the Labour Party on the question of unemployment than it had with its prospective coalition partners, the Progressive Democrats. Flatly rejecting the Progressive Democrats’ proposals to shed 25 000 jobs in the public sector, she projected Fianna Fáil as the defender of the public sector.¹ Her remarks were, of course, a classic example of Fianna Fáil tactics and rhetoric . By ‘muddying the waters’ of those who sought to portray the election as a contest between a centre-left rainbow coalition and a centre-right Fianna Fáil– Progressive Democrats alignment, she emphasised Fianna Fáil’s ability to face both ‘left’ and ‘right’ simultaneously. The statement indicated to the trade union movement that Fianna Fáil, which has continued to win more working-class votes than the Labour Party and Democratic Left combined, understood the economic concerns of both the unemployed and public sector worker components of its cross-class electoral bloc. Thereby setting limits to the extent to which that cross-class electoral bloc would be endangered by the pursuit of orthodox economic
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIreland
Subtitle of host publicationThe Politics of Independence, 1922-49
EditorsMike Cronin, John M. Regan
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages67-83
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9780230535695
ISBN (Print)9780333720516
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

hegemony
social class
public sector
Labour Party
trade union
politics
unemployment
coalition
union movement
election campaign
working class
tactics
Ireland
economics
voter
rhetoric
election
leader
worker
ability

Keywords

  • Migration
  • Europe
  • Peri
  • Arena
  • Rium

Cite this

Dunphy, R. (2000). The Enigma of Fianna Fail: Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony. In M. Cronin, & J. M. Regan (Eds.), Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922-49 (pp. 67-83). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dunphy, Richard. / The Enigma of Fianna Fail : Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony. Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922-49. editor / Mike Cronin ; John M. Regan. United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. pp. 67-83
@inbook{8cdc8086b1124707811f18312d7d5b24,
title = "The Enigma of Fianna Fail: Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony",
abstract = "During the 1997 general election campaign in Ireland, the deputy leader of Fianna F{\'a}il, Mary O’Rourke, told a seminar on unemployment organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions that her party had more in common with the Labour Party on the question of unemployment than it had with its prospective coalition partners, the Progressive Democrats. Flatly rejecting the Progressive Democrats’ proposals to shed 25 000 jobs in the public sector, she projected Fianna F{\'a}il as the defender of the public sector.¹ Her remarks were, of course, a classic example of Fianna F{\'a}il tactics and rhetoric . By ‘muddying the waters’ of those who sought to portray the election as a contest between a centre-left rainbow coalition and a centre-right Fianna F{\'a}il– Progressive Democrats alignment, she emphasised Fianna F{\'a}il’s ability to face both ‘left’ and ‘right’ simultaneously. The statement indicated to the trade union movement that Fianna F{\'a}il, which has continued to win more working-class votes than the Labour Party and Democratic Left combined, understood the economic concerns of both the unemployed and public sector worker components of its cross-class electoral bloc. Thereby setting limits to the extent to which that cross-class electoral bloc would be endangered by the pursuit of orthodox economic",
keywords = "Migration, Europe, Peri, Arena, Rium",
author = "Richard Dunphy",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780333720516",
pages = "67--83",
editor = "Mike Cronin and Regan, {John M.}",
booktitle = "Ireland",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Dunphy, R 2000, The Enigma of Fianna Fail: Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony. in M Cronin & JM Regan (eds), Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922-49. Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom, pp. 67-83.

The Enigma of Fianna Fail : Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony. / Dunphy, Richard.

Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922-49. ed. / Mike Cronin; John M. Regan. United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. p. 67-83.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Enigma of Fianna Fail

T2 - Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony

AU - Dunphy, Richard

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - During the 1997 general election campaign in Ireland, the deputy leader of Fianna Fáil, Mary O’Rourke, told a seminar on unemployment organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions that her party had more in common with the Labour Party on the question of unemployment than it had with its prospective coalition partners, the Progressive Democrats. Flatly rejecting the Progressive Democrats’ proposals to shed 25 000 jobs in the public sector, she projected Fianna Fáil as the defender of the public sector.¹ Her remarks were, of course, a classic example of Fianna Fáil tactics and rhetoric . By ‘muddying the waters’ of those who sought to portray the election as a contest between a centre-left rainbow coalition and a centre-right Fianna Fáil– Progressive Democrats alignment, she emphasised Fianna Fáil’s ability to face both ‘left’ and ‘right’ simultaneously. The statement indicated to the trade union movement that Fianna Fáil, which has continued to win more working-class votes than the Labour Party and Democratic Left combined, understood the economic concerns of both the unemployed and public sector worker components of its cross-class electoral bloc. Thereby setting limits to the extent to which that cross-class electoral bloc would be endangered by the pursuit of orthodox economic

AB - During the 1997 general election campaign in Ireland, the deputy leader of Fianna Fáil, Mary O’Rourke, told a seminar on unemployment organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions that her party had more in common with the Labour Party on the question of unemployment than it had with its prospective coalition partners, the Progressive Democrats. Flatly rejecting the Progressive Democrats’ proposals to shed 25 000 jobs in the public sector, she projected Fianna Fáil as the defender of the public sector.¹ Her remarks were, of course, a classic example of Fianna Fáil tactics and rhetoric . By ‘muddying the waters’ of those who sought to portray the election as a contest between a centre-left rainbow coalition and a centre-right Fianna Fáil– Progressive Democrats alignment, she emphasised Fianna Fáil’s ability to face both ‘left’ and ‘right’ simultaneously. The statement indicated to the trade union movement that Fianna Fáil, which has continued to win more working-class votes than the Labour Party and Democratic Left combined, understood the economic concerns of both the unemployed and public sector worker components of its cross-class electoral bloc. Thereby setting limits to the extent to which that cross-class electoral bloc would be endangered by the pursuit of orthodox economic

KW - Migration

KW - Europe

KW - Peri

KW - Arena

KW - Rium

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9780333720516

SP - 67

EP - 83

BT - Ireland

A2 - Cronin, Mike

A2 - Regan, John M.

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - United Kingdom

ER -

Dunphy R. The Enigma of Fianna Fail: Party Strategy, Social Classes and the Politics of Hegemony. In Cronin M, Regan JM, editors, Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922-49. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. 2000. p. 67-83