The EU and the Gulf monarchies: normative power Europe in search of a strategy for engagement

Thomas Demmelhuber, Christian Kaunert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Persian Gulf region is of strategic importance to the European Union (EU). Yet, different political realities of authoritarian government in the Gulf challenge crucial parts of EU foreign policy that are based on normative power Europe concepts. Cooperation with the ruling dynasties appears beneficial for EU decision-makers if one looks at the comprehensive agenda of common interests in the Gulf region. In 2004, the EU aimed to build a strategic partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East; in this the EU emphasized its commitment to advancing its partnership with the Gulf countries. Yet, from the perspective of 2012 the results are bleak. Despite some signs of improvement in deepening the political, economic and security interactions with the region, there is still no concerted EU policy in the Gulf beyond the thriving bilateral activities of some EU member states. The events of the Arab Spring have increased the challenges even further. The EU, on the one hand, is trying to support forces of liberal and democratic reform in some neighbouring countries. On the other hand, it seeks close partnerships with authoritarian family dynasties in those Gulf countries in which a democratic opening is not around the corner. This article suggests an alternative explanation for this dichotomy. While there is an inherent tension between the EU's reformist agenda and its own interests, whether security or trade interests, this article argues that much of the EU's relationship with the Gulf countries can be explained through a misperception of the specific settings of government in the region. Despite a substantial agenda of interests on both sides in areas such as trade, energy, regional security, terrorism and irregular migration, the EU's foreign policy outputs remain rather limited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)574-592
    Number of pages19
    JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    Early online date23 Apr 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    EU
    European foreign policy
    Persian Gulf
    neighboring countries
    Middle East
    foreign policy
    decision maker
    terrorism
    migration
    commitment
    energy
    reform
    event
    interaction
    economics
    strategic alliance
    Arab Spring

    Cite this

    @article{db1f4ff688204f1cae9aa2a81fc1035b,
    title = "The EU and the Gulf monarchies: normative power Europe in search of a strategy for engagement",
    abstract = "The Persian Gulf region is of strategic importance to the European Union (EU). Yet, different political realities of authoritarian government in the Gulf challenge crucial parts of EU foreign policy that are based on normative power Europe concepts. Cooperation with the ruling dynasties appears beneficial for EU decision-makers if one looks at the comprehensive agenda of common interests in the Gulf region. In 2004, the EU aimed to build a strategic partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East; in this the EU emphasized its commitment to advancing its partnership with the Gulf countries. Yet, from the perspective of 2012 the results are bleak. Despite some signs of improvement in deepening the political, economic and security interactions with the region, there is still no concerted EU policy in the Gulf beyond the thriving bilateral activities of some EU member states. The events of the Arab Spring have increased the challenges even further. The EU, on the one hand, is trying to support forces of liberal and democratic reform in some neighbouring countries. On the other hand, it seeks close partnerships with authoritarian family dynasties in those Gulf countries in which a democratic opening is not around the corner. This article suggests an alternative explanation for this dichotomy. While there is an inherent tension between the EU's reformist agenda and its own interests, whether security or trade interests, this article argues that much of the EU's relationship with the Gulf countries can be explained through a misperception of the specific settings of government in the region. Despite a substantial agenda of interests on both sides in areas such as trade, energy, regional security, terrorism and irregular migration, the EU's foreign policy outputs remain rather limited.",
    author = "Thomas Demmelhuber and Christian Kaunert",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/09557571.2013.855168",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "574--592",
    journal = "Cambridge Review of International Affairs",
    issn = "0955-7571",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "3",

    }

    The EU and the Gulf monarchies : normative power Europe in search of a strategy for engagement. / Demmelhuber, Thomas; Kaunert, Christian.

    In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2014, p. 574-592.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The EU and the Gulf monarchies

    T2 - normative power Europe in search of a strategy for engagement

    AU - Demmelhuber, Thomas

    AU - Kaunert, Christian

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The Persian Gulf region is of strategic importance to the European Union (EU). Yet, different political realities of authoritarian government in the Gulf challenge crucial parts of EU foreign policy that are based on normative power Europe concepts. Cooperation with the ruling dynasties appears beneficial for EU decision-makers if one looks at the comprehensive agenda of common interests in the Gulf region. In 2004, the EU aimed to build a strategic partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East; in this the EU emphasized its commitment to advancing its partnership with the Gulf countries. Yet, from the perspective of 2012 the results are bleak. Despite some signs of improvement in deepening the political, economic and security interactions with the region, there is still no concerted EU policy in the Gulf beyond the thriving bilateral activities of some EU member states. The events of the Arab Spring have increased the challenges even further. The EU, on the one hand, is trying to support forces of liberal and democratic reform in some neighbouring countries. On the other hand, it seeks close partnerships with authoritarian family dynasties in those Gulf countries in which a democratic opening is not around the corner. This article suggests an alternative explanation for this dichotomy. While there is an inherent tension between the EU's reformist agenda and its own interests, whether security or trade interests, this article argues that much of the EU's relationship with the Gulf countries can be explained through a misperception of the specific settings of government in the region. Despite a substantial agenda of interests on both sides in areas such as trade, energy, regional security, terrorism and irregular migration, the EU's foreign policy outputs remain rather limited.

    AB - The Persian Gulf region is of strategic importance to the European Union (EU). Yet, different political realities of authoritarian government in the Gulf challenge crucial parts of EU foreign policy that are based on normative power Europe concepts. Cooperation with the ruling dynasties appears beneficial for EU decision-makers if one looks at the comprehensive agenda of common interests in the Gulf region. In 2004, the EU aimed to build a strategic partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East; in this the EU emphasized its commitment to advancing its partnership with the Gulf countries. Yet, from the perspective of 2012 the results are bleak. Despite some signs of improvement in deepening the political, economic and security interactions with the region, there is still no concerted EU policy in the Gulf beyond the thriving bilateral activities of some EU member states. The events of the Arab Spring have increased the challenges even further. The EU, on the one hand, is trying to support forces of liberal and democratic reform in some neighbouring countries. On the other hand, it seeks close partnerships with authoritarian family dynasties in those Gulf countries in which a democratic opening is not around the corner. This article suggests an alternative explanation for this dichotomy. While there is an inherent tension between the EU's reformist agenda and its own interests, whether security or trade interests, this article argues that much of the EU's relationship with the Gulf countries can be explained through a misperception of the specific settings of government in the region. Despite a substantial agenda of interests on both sides in areas such as trade, energy, regional security, terrorism and irregular migration, the EU's foreign policy outputs remain rather limited.

    UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84914677239&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=The+EU+and+the+Gulf+monarchies&st2=&sid=AE2460AE736435030897D07934E37930.euC1gMODexYlPkQec4u1Q%3a30&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=45&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28The+EU+and+the+Gulf+monarchies%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

    U2 - 10.1080/09557571.2013.855168

    DO - 10.1080/09557571.2013.855168

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 574

    EP - 592

    JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

    JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

    SN - 0955-7571

    IS - 3

    ER -