The Faroe Islands: Possible Lessons for Scotland in a New Post-Brexit Devolution Settlement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Brexit referendum saw millions of people voting to “take back control” from Brussels. The decision to leave the EU and to return powers to the UK has created new constitutional complexity, especially for Scotland, which overwhelmingly voted to remain. The Scottish Government has made it clear that, despite the overall result, it wants to retain key benefits of EU membership, even if the rest of the UK leaves the EU and the Single Market. The difficulty now is finding a constitutional compromise that addresses the concerns of the Scottish Government as the UK leaves the EU in March 2019. The Faroe Islands' reserved powers model can potentially yield important lessons for Scotland. Despite refusing to accede with Denmark in 1973, the Faroes has developed a close relationship with the EU. The case of the Faroes shows that there are no legal barriers in EU or international law against Scotland following a similar path. A constitutional compromise can be achieved through the use of international legal personality and the political will to find a settlement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-122
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume44
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

decentralization
EU
compromise
European Law
referendum
Denmark
international law
voting
personality
market

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • Devolution
  • Brexit
  • International personallity
  • Faroe Islands
  • Denmark
  • EU
  • International Law
  • Sub-state enteties

Cite this

@article{466a76f8c5134c9bb49261bf998bac38,
title = "The Faroe Islands: Possible Lessons for Scotland in a New Post-Brexit Devolution Settlement",
abstract = "The Brexit referendum saw millions of people voting to “take back control” from Brussels. The decision to leave the EU and to return powers to the UK has created new constitutional complexity, especially for Scotland, which overwhelmingly voted to remain. The Scottish Government has made it clear that, despite the overall result, it wants to retain key benefits of EU membership, even if the rest of the UK leaves the EU and the Single Market. The difficulty now is finding a constitutional compromise that addresses the concerns of the Scottish Government as the UK leaves the EU in March 2019. The Faroe Islands' reserved powers model can potentially yield important lessons for Scotland. Despite refusing to accede with Denmark in 1973, the Faroes has developed a close relationship with the EU. The case of the Faroes shows that there are no legal barriers in EU or international law against Scotland following a similar path. A constitutional compromise can be achieved through the use of international legal personality and the political will to find a settlement.",
keywords = "Scotland, Devolution, Brexit, International personallity, Faroe Islands, Denmark, EU, International Law , Sub-state enteties",
author = "Jacques Hartmann",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "110--122",
journal = "European Law Review",
issn = "0307-5400",
publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell",
number = "1",

}

The Faroe Islands : Possible Lessons for Scotland in a New Post-Brexit Devolution Settlement. / Hartmann, Jacques.

In: European Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 110-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Faroe Islands

T2 - Possible Lessons for Scotland in a New Post-Brexit Devolution Settlement

AU - Hartmann, Jacques

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - The Brexit referendum saw millions of people voting to “take back control” from Brussels. The decision to leave the EU and to return powers to the UK has created new constitutional complexity, especially for Scotland, which overwhelmingly voted to remain. The Scottish Government has made it clear that, despite the overall result, it wants to retain key benefits of EU membership, even if the rest of the UK leaves the EU and the Single Market. The difficulty now is finding a constitutional compromise that addresses the concerns of the Scottish Government as the UK leaves the EU in March 2019. The Faroe Islands' reserved powers model can potentially yield important lessons for Scotland. Despite refusing to accede with Denmark in 1973, the Faroes has developed a close relationship with the EU. The case of the Faroes shows that there are no legal barriers in EU or international law against Scotland following a similar path. A constitutional compromise can be achieved through the use of international legal personality and the political will to find a settlement.

AB - The Brexit referendum saw millions of people voting to “take back control” from Brussels. The decision to leave the EU and to return powers to the UK has created new constitutional complexity, especially for Scotland, which overwhelmingly voted to remain. The Scottish Government has made it clear that, despite the overall result, it wants to retain key benefits of EU membership, even if the rest of the UK leaves the EU and the Single Market. The difficulty now is finding a constitutional compromise that addresses the concerns of the Scottish Government as the UK leaves the EU in March 2019. The Faroe Islands' reserved powers model can potentially yield important lessons for Scotland. Despite refusing to accede with Denmark in 1973, the Faroes has developed a close relationship with the EU. The case of the Faroes shows that there are no legal barriers in EU or international law against Scotland following a similar path. A constitutional compromise can be achieved through the use of international legal personality and the political will to find a settlement.

KW - Scotland

KW - Devolution

KW - Brexit

KW - International personallity

KW - Faroe Islands

KW - Denmark

KW - EU

KW - International Law

KW - Sub-state enteties

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2909543

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061721464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 110

EP - 122

JO - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

SN - 0307-5400

IS - 1

ER -