Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) inflammation criteria to predict survival in patients with advanced cancer: A prospective cohort study

  • Chattarin Pumtako (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Ross D Dolan
  • , Marie Fallon
  • , Erin S Sullivan
  • , Claribel Pl Simmons
  • , Aoife M Ryan
  • , Josh McGovern
  • , Derek G Power
  • , Barry J Laird
  • , Donald C McMillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND 

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria provides a framework for assessing cachexia in cancer patients. However, the role of systemic inflammation in this framework needs further exploration.

METHODS 

This study analyzed a cohort of 388 advanced cancer patients from 18 oncological care settings. C-reactive protein (CRP), the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were used to assess systemic inflammation. Associations between these inflammatory markers and Weight Loss (WL), Body Mass Index (BMI), Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), and survival outcomes (OS) were evaluated using Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS 

CRP was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.01), and WL (p < 0.05). mGPS was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). NLR was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p < 0.05), WL (p < 0.001), and BMI (p < 0.05). CRP (p < 0.001), mGPS (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), WL (p < 0.001), and SMI (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with OS, but not BMI (p = 0.23). Combining CRP, mGPS, NLR, with WL, BMI, and SMI significantly improved OS prediction. WL was significantly associated with OS in patients with NLR<3 (p < 0.05) but not in CRP≤10 mg/L or mGPS = 0. SMI was significantly associated with OS in patients with mGPS = 0 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Systemic inflammation, as assessed by CRP, mGPS and NLR, significantly improves the relationship between phenotypic criteria and OS. These findings support the GLIM framework's inclusion of systemic inflammation as a critical factor. Given its strong predictive value, systemic inflammation should be prioritized in routine clinical assessments of cancer patients, with mGPS having greater prognostic value within the GLIM framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-352
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Nutrition ESPEN
Volume67
Early online date28 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Neoplasms/mortality
  • Male
  • Female
  • Prospective Studies
  • Malnutrition/diagnosis
  • Inflammation/diagnosis
  • C-Reactive Protein/analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cachexia/diagnosis
  • Neutrophils
  • Prognosis
  • Biomarkers/blood
  • Nutritional Status
  • Leadership
  • Nutrition Assessment
  • Weight Loss
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Adult
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Prognostic value
  • Phenotypic
  • GLIM
  • Etiologic
  • Cance cachexia
  • Systemic inflammation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) inflammation criteria to predict survival in patients with advanced cancer: A prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this