Abstract
This Article explores whether there is a causal link between the surge in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) in the 1990s and the decline in political risk insurance (PRI) policies issued by public providers such as the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) which coincided with BIT proliferation. The central question addressed in this Article is how the availability of rights and remedies which are directly actionable and enforceable against host countries has affected, or should affect, foreign investors’ desire or need to purchase PRI in today’s investment environment, and how this affects the demand for public PRI in comparison to private PRI.
In this context, the Article offers a comparison of the protective architecture of BITs with that provided by PRI policies.
The Article, which draws on PRI industry reports and survey data, also explores to what extent BITs have helped to create an environment enabling private insurers to enter the PRI market. Given the steady growth of private PRI providers, the Article finally offers a reassessment of the role of public insurance in the light of today’s political risks, real and perceived.
In this context, the Article offers a comparison of the protective architecture of BITs with that provided by PRI policies.
The Article, which draws on PRI industry reports and survey data, also explores to what extent BITs have helped to create an environment enabling private insurers to enter the PRI market. Given the steady growth of private PRI providers, the Article finally offers a reassessment of the role of public insurance in the light of today’s political risks, real and perceived.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 314-350 |
Number of pages | 37 |
Journal | ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal (ICSID Review) |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2013 |