The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry

Jacques Hartmann, Annalisa Savaresi, Ioana Cismas

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The suitability of human rights law to address harm caused by climate change depends upon whether a victim can substantiate a claim that a duty bearer has contributed to climate change, in such a way as to amount to a human rights violation. Qualifying the effects of climate change as human rights violations, however, poses technical obstacles concerning causality, retrospectivity, apportionment, as well as the provision of an adequate remedy. Yet, these obstacles are not insurmountable. As scientific knowledge improves, tracing causal connections between particular emissions and resultant harms is becoming less difficult. These arguments are being tested in the context of the so-called ‘Carbon Majors’ inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of the Philippines. The inquiry concerns the responsibility of a group of global corporations – dubbed the ‘Carbon Majors’ and including the likes of BP, Chevron, Exxon and Shell – for human rights violations or threats thereof resulting from the impacts of climate change. This paper looks at the Carbon Majors inquiry to critically appraise the role of human rights law in solving complex questions associated with responsibility for the impacts of climate change. The paper builds on the authors’ experience of providing expert advice in the context of the Carbon Majors inquiry. The inquiry will therefore be used as a point of departure to unpack the questions concerning jurisdiction, causality, retrospectivity, and the provision of an adequate remedy. The conclusion provides some reflections on the role of human rights law in addressing the harm associated with the impacts of climate change.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 18 Nov 2018
EventClimate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific - National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Duration: 7 Jun 20188 Jun 2018
https://law.nus.edu.sg/apcel/activities/2017/Call%20for%20papers_cc%20litigation%20workshop%20(Final).pdf

Workshop

WorkshopClimate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific
CountrySingapore
CitySingapore
Period7/06/188/06/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

human rights
climate change
human rights violation
causality
remedies
Law
responsibility
Philippines
jurisdiction
corporation
expert
threat
knowledge
experience
Group

Cite this

Hartmann, J., Savaresi, A., & Cismas, I. (2018). The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry. Paper presented at Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore.
Hartmann, Jacques ; Savaresi, Annalisa ; Cismas, Ioana. / The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry. Paper presented at Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore.16 p.
@conference{2643b5fd15d541ac83f32378f15454ae,
title = "The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry",
abstract = "The suitability of human rights law to address harm caused by climate change depends upon whether a victim can substantiate a claim that a duty bearer has contributed to climate change, in such a way as to amount to a human rights violation. Qualifying the effects of climate change as human rights violations, however, poses technical obstacles concerning causality, retrospectivity, apportionment, as well as the provision of an adequate remedy. Yet, these obstacles are not insurmountable. As scientific knowledge improves, tracing causal connections between particular emissions and resultant harms is becoming less difficult. These arguments are being tested in the context of the so-called ‘Carbon Majors’ inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of the Philippines. The inquiry concerns the responsibility of a group of global corporations – dubbed the ‘Carbon Majors’ and including the likes of BP, Chevron, Exxon and Shell – for human rights violations or threats thereof resulting from the impacts of climate change. This paper looks at the Carbon Majors inquiry to critically appraise the role of human rights law in solving complex questions associated with responsibility for the impacts of climate change. The paper builds on the authors’ experience of providing expert advice in the context of the Carbon Majors inquiry. The inquiry will therefore be used as a point of departure to unpack the questions concerning jurisdiction, causality, retrospectivity, and the provision of an adequate remedy. The conclusion provides some reflections on the role of human rights law in addressing the harm associated with the impacts of climate change.",
author = "Jacques Hartmann and Annalisa Savaresi and Ioana Cismas",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "18",
language = "English",
note = "Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific ; Conference date: 07-06-2018 Through 08-06-2018",
url = "https://law.nus.edu.sg/apcel/activities/2017/Call{\%}20for{\%}20papers_cc{\%}20litigation{\%}20workshop{\%}20(Final).pdf",

}

Hartmann, J, Savaresi, A & Cismas, I 2018, 'The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry', Paper presented at Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore, 7/06/18 - 8/06/18.

The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry. / Hartmann, Jacques; Savaresi, Annalisa; Cismas, Ioana.

2018. Paper presented at Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry

AU - Hartmann, Jacques

AU - Savaresi, Annalisa

AU - Cismas, Ioana

PY - 2018/11/18

Y1 - 2018/11/18

N2 - The suitability of human rights law to address harm caused by climate change depends upon whether a victim can substantiate a claim that a duty bearer has contributed to climate change, in such a way as to amount to a human rights violation. Qualifying the effects of climate change as human rights violations, however, poses technical obstacles concerning causality, retrospectivity, apportionment, as well as the provision of an adequate remedy. Yet, these obstacles are not insurmountable. As scientific knowledge improves, tracing causal connections between particular emissions and resultant harms is becoming less difficult. These arguments are being tested in the context of the so-called ‘Carbon Majors’ inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of the Philippines. The inquiry concerns the responsibility of a group of global corporations – dubbed the ‘Carbon Majors’ and including the likes of BP, Chevron, Exxon and Shell – for human rights violations or threats thereof resulting from the impacts of climate change. This paper looks at the Carbon Majors inquiry to critically appraise the role of human rights law in solving complex questions associated with responsibility for the impacts of climate change. The paper builds on the authors’ experience of providing expert advice in the context of the Carbon Majors inquiry. The inquiry will therefore be used as a point of departure to unpack the questions concerning jurisdiction, causality, retrospectivity, and the provision of an adequate remedy. The conclusion provides some reflections on the role of human rights law in addressing the harm associated with the impacts of climate change.

AB - The suitability of human rights law to address harm caused by climate change depends upon whether a victim can substantiate a claim that a duty bearer has contributed to climate change, in such a way as to amount to a human rights violation. Qualifying the effects of climate change as human rights violations, however, poses technical obstacles concerning causality, retrospectivity, apportionment, as well as the provision of an adequate remedy. Yet, these obstacles are not insurmountable. As scientific knowledge improves, tracing causal connections between particular emissions and resultant harms is becoming less difficult. These arguments are being tested in the context of the so-called ‘Carbon Majors’ inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of the Philippines. The inquiry concerns the responsibility of a group of global corporations – dubbed the ‘Carbon Majors’ and including the likes of BP, Chevron, Exxon and Shell – for human rights violations or threats thereof resulting from the impacts of climate change. This paper looks at the Carbon Majors inquiry to critically appraise the role of human rights law in solving complex questions associated with responsibility for the impacts of climate change. The paper builds on the authors’ experience of providing expert advice in the context of the Carbon Majors inquiry. The inquiry will therefore be used as a point of departure to unpack the questions concerning jurisdiction, causality, retrospectivity, and the provision of an adequate remedy. The conclusion provides some reflections on the role of human rights law in addressing the harm associated with the impacts of climate change.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Hartmann J, Savaresi A, Cismas I. The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Rights: 
Some Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry. 2018. Paper presented at Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore.