The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries: Evidence from the Solomon Islands

Jasper O. Kenter, Tony Hyde, Michael Christie, Ioan Fazey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    127 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Monetary valuation of ecosystem services enables more accurate accounting of the environmental costs and benefits of policies, but this has rarely been applied in developing countries. In such contexts, there are particular methodological and epistemological challenges that require novel valuation methodologies. This paper introduces a new participatory, deliberative choice experiment approach conducted in the Solomon Islands. The research aimed to determine the value people placed on ecosystem services and whether participatory interventions to elicit deeper held values influenced the preferences expressed. Results found that the initial willingness to pay for a number of tropical forest ecosystem services amounted to 30% of household income. Following deliberative intervention exercises, key ecosystem services effectively became priceless as participants were unwilling to trade them off in the choice experiment scenarios, regardless of financial cost. The group based deliberative approach, combined with participatory interventions, also resulted in significant learning for participants. This included a more sophisticated view of ecological-cultural linkages, greater recognition of deeper held values, and greater awareness of the consequences of human actions for the environment. The use of a group-based participatory approach instead of a conventional individual survey helped to overcome many of the practical difficulties associated with valuation in developing countries. Given the impact of learning on valuation outcomes, participation and deliberation should be integrated into valuation of any complex good, both in developing and developed economies. However, such a methodology raises questions about how valuation can deal with unwillingness to trade-off key ecosystem services, which results in the breakdown of monetary valuation methods. Evaluation of the appropriateness of valuation processes and methodologies for assessing deeper held values and use of mixed-method approaches will be essential to ensure policies take into account the extent to which human life is dependent on ecosystem services.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)505-521
    Number of pages17
    JournalGlobal Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2011

    Fingerprint

    Melanesia
    valuation
    deliberation
    ecosystem service
    developing world
    developing country
    evidence
    Values
    methodology
    trade-off
    learning
    experiment
    willingness to pay
    costs
    household income
    participatory approach
    Group
    scenario
    participation
    economy

    Cite this

    @article{f27dd3a3d3b941ae8a34ed0a48b41102,
    title = "The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries: Evidence from the Solomon Islands",
    abstract = "Monetary valuation of ecosystem services enables more accurate accounting of the environmental costs and benefits of policies, but this has rarely been applied in developing countries. In such contexts, there are particular methodological and epistemological challenges that require novel valuation methodologies. This paper introduces a new participatory, deliberative choice experiment approach conducted in the Solomon Islands. The research aimed to determine the value people placed on ecosystem services and whether participatory interventions to elicit deeper held values influenced the preferences expressed. Results found that the initial willingness to pay for a number of tropical forest ecosystem services amounted to 30{\%} of household income. Following deliberative intervention exercises, key ecosystem services effectively became priceless as participants were unwilling to trade them off in the choice experiment scenarios, regardless of financial cost. The group based deliberative approach, combined with participatory interventions, also resulted in significant learning for participants. This included a more sophisticated view of ecological-cultural linkages, greater recognition of deeper held values, and greater awareness of the consequences of human actions for the environment. The use of a group-based participatory approach instead of a conventional individual survey helped to overcome many of the practical difficulties associated with valuation in developing countries. Given the impact of learning on valuation outcomes, participation and deliberation should be integrated into valuation of any complex good, both in developing and developed economies. However, such a methodology raises questions about how valuation can deal with unwillingness to trade-off key ecosystem services, which results in the breakdown of monetary valuation methods. Evaluation of the appropriateness of valuation processes and methodologies for assessing deeper held values and use of mixed-method approaches will be essential to ensure policies take into account the extent to which human life is dependent on ecosystem services.",
    author = "Kenter, {Jasper O.} and Tony Hyde and Michael Christie and Ioan Fazey",
    year = "2011",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "505--521",
    journal = "Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions",
    issn = "0959-3780",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "2",

    }

    The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries : Evidence from the Solomon Islands. / Kenter, Jasper O.; Hyde, Tony; Christie, Michael; Fazey, Ioan.

    In: Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, Vol. 21, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 505-521.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries

    T2 - Evidence from the Solomon Islands

    AU - Kenter, Jasper O.

    AU - Hyde, Tony

    AU - Christie, Michael

    AU - Fazey, Ioan

    PY - 2011/5

    Y1 - 2011/5

    N2 - Monetary valuation of ecosystem services enables more accurate accounting of the environmental costs and benefits of policies, but this has rarely been applied in developing countries. In such contexts, there are particular methodological and epistemological challenges that require novel valuation methodologies. This paper introduces a new participatory, deliberative choice experiment approach conducted in the Solomon Islands. The research aimed to determine the value people placed on ecosystem services and whether participatory interventions to elicit deeper held values influenced the preferences expressed. Results found that the initial willingness to pay for a number of tropical forest ecosystem services amounted to 30% of household income. Following deliberative intervention exercises, key ecosystem services effectively became priceless as participants were unwilling to trade them off in the choice experiment scenarios, regardless of financial cost. The group based deliberative approach, combined with participatory interventions, also resulted in significant learning for participants. This included a more sophisticated view of ecological-cultural linkages, greater recognition of deeper held values, and greater awareness of the consequences of human actions for the environment. The use of a group-based participatory approach instead of a conventional individual survey helped to overcome many of the practical difficulties associated with valuation in developing countries. Given the impact of learning on valuation outcomes, participation and deliberation should be integrated into valuation of any complex good, both in developing and developed economies. However, such a methodology raises questions about how valuation can deal with unwillingness to trade-off key ecosystem services, which results in the breakdown of monetary valuation methods. Evaluation of the appropriateness of valuation processes and methodologies for assessing deeper held values and use of mixed-method approaches will be essential to ensure policies take into account the extent to which human life is dependent on ecosystem services.

    AB - Monetary valuation of ecosystem services enables more accurate accounting of the environmental costs and benefits of policies, but this has rarely been applied in developing countries. In such contexts, there are particular methodological and epistemological challenges that require novel valuation methodologies. This paper introduces a new participatory, deliberative choice experiment approach conducted in the Solomon Islands. The research aimed to determine the value people placed on ecosystem services and whether participatory interventions to elicit deeper held values influenced the preferences expressed. Results found that the initial willingness to pay for a number of tropical forest ecosystem services amounted to 30% of household income. Following deliberative intervention exercises, key ecosystem services effectively became priceless as participants were unwilling to trade them off in the choice experiment scenarios, regardless of financial cost. The group based deliberative approach, combined with participatory interventions, also resulted in significant learning for participants. This included a more sophisticated view of ecological-cultural linkages, greater recognition of deeper held values, and greater awareness of the consequences of human actions for the environment. The use of a group-based participatory approach instead of a conventional individual survey helped to overcome many of the practical difficulties associated with valuation in developing countries. Given the impact of learning on valuation outcomes, participation and deliberation should be integrated into valuation of any complex good, both in developing and developed economies. However, such a methodology raises questions about how valuation can deal with unwillingness to trade-off key ecosystem services, which results in the breakdown of monetary valuation methods. Evaluation of the appropriateness of valuation processes and methodologies for assessing deeper held values and use of mixed-method approaches will be essential to ensure policies take into account the extent to which human life is dependent on ecosystem services.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 505

    EP - 521

    JO - Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions

    JF - Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions

    SN - 0959-3780

    IS - 2

    ER -