The Learning Styles educational neuromyth: Lack of agreement between teachers’ judgments, self-assessment, and students’ intelligence

Marietta Papadatou-Pastou (Lead / Corresponding author), Maria Gritzal, Alexia Barrable

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)
    346 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Learning styles (LS) have dominated educational practice since their popularization in the 1970s. Studies have shown that they are accepted by more than 90% of teachers worldwide. However, LS have also received extensive criticism from researchers and academics, due to the poor theoretical justification of the theory, their problematic measurement, and the lack of systematic studies supporting them. The present study tested the hypothesis that teachers’ and students’ assessment of preferred LS should correspond. Moreover, it tested whether teachers’ judgment of LS is driven by the students’ IQ. Both questions were studied for the first time in a systematic fashion within LS research in primary school pupils. Fifth and sixth grade pupils (n = 199) were asked to self-assess their preferred LS, while their teachers were asked to provide their own assessment on individual pupils’ LS. No relationship was found between pupils’ self-assessment and teachers’ assessment, suggesting that teachers cannot assess the LS of their students accurately. Moreover, students’ intelligence was not found to drive teachers’ assessment of their learning styles. This study adds to the body of evidence that is skeptical of the adoption of LS in mainstream education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number105
    Pages (from-to)1-5
    Number of pages5
    JournalFrontiers in Education
    Volume3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2018

    Keywords

    • learning styles
    • auditory
    • kinaesthetic
    • neuromyths
    • VAK
    • intelligence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Learning Styles educational neuromyth: Lack of agreement between teachers’ judgments, self-assessment, and students’ intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this