The Limits of Co-Operation and Judicial Independence: Resolving the Question of 'How Low Do You Go?' in the Khmer Rouge Trials’ Bicephalous Prosecution

Padraig McAuliffe

The Limits of Co-Operation and Judicial Independence: Resolving the Question of 'How Low Do You Go?' in the Khmer Rouge Trials’ Bicephalous Prosecution

Padraig McAuliffe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	110-142
Number of pages	32
Journal	University of Tasmania Law Review
Volume	29
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2010

Keywords

Khmer Rouge
Hybrid Tribunal
Prosecutorial Selectivity

Access to Document

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UTasLawRw/2010/6.html

Cite this

@article{31e33d03b4024ec9a2ef0db8e4a191d6,

title = "The Limits of Co-Operation and Judicial Independence: Resolving the Question of 'How Low Do You Go?' in the Khmer Rouge Trials{\textquoteright} Bicephalous Prosecution",

keywords = "Khmer Rouge, Hybrid Tribunal, Prosecutorial Selectivity",

author = "Padraig McAuliffe",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "110--142",

journal = "University of Tasmania Law Review",

issn = "0082-2108",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limits of Co-Operation and Judicial Independence

T2 - Resolving the Question of 'How Low Do You Go?' in the Khmer Rouge Trials’ Bicephalous Prosecution

AU - McAuliffe, Padraig

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

KW - Khmer Rouge

KW - Hybrid Tribunal

KW - Prosecutorial Selectivity

M3 - Article

SN - 0082-2108

VL - 29

SP - 110

EP - 142

JO - University of Tasmania Law Review

JF - University of Tasmania Law Review

IS - 2

ER -