The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?

Carlo Morelli, Paul Seaman

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    257 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The revival of support for a living wage has reopened a long-run debate over the extent to which active regulation of labour markets may be necessary to attain desired outcomes. Market failure is suggested to result in lower wages and remuneration for low skilled workers than might otherwise be expected from models of perfect competition. This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of living wage campaigns and demonstrates that once we move away from idealised models of perfect competition to one where employers retain power over the bargaining process, such as monopsony, it is readily understandable that low wages may be endemic in low skilled employment contracts. The paper then examines evidence, derived from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey, for the extent to which a living wage will address low pay within the labour force. We highlight the greater incidence of low pay within the private sector and then focus upon the public sector where the Living Wage demand has had most impact. We examine the extent to which addressing low pay within the public sector increases costs. We further highlight the evidence that a predominance of low pay exists among public sector young and women workers (and in particular lone parent women workers) but not, perhaps surprisingly, among workers from ethnic minority backgrounds. The paper then builds upon the results from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey with analysis of the British Household Panel Survey in order to examine the impact the introduction of a living wage, within the public sector, would have in reducing household inequality. The paper concludes that a living wage is indeed an appropriate regulatory response to market failure for low skilled workers and can act to reduce age and gender pay inequality, and reduce household income inequality among in-work households below average earnings.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherUniversity of Dundee
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Publication series

    NameDundee Discussion Papers in Economics
    PublisherUniversity of Dundee
    No.239
    ISSN (Print)1473-236X

    Fingerprint

    Living wage
    Low pay
    Public sector
    Labor force
    Market failure
    Women workers
    Perfect competition
    Wages
    Skilled workers
    Remuneration
    Private sector
    Costs
    Ethnic minorities
    Income inequality
    Household
    Monopsony
    British Household Panel Survey
    Household income
    Labour market
    Employers

    Keywords

    • Living wage
    • Poverty
    • Inequality
    • Minimum wage

    Cite this

    Morelli, C., & Seaman, P. (2010). The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK? (Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics; No. 239). University of Dundee.
    Morelli, Carlo ; Seaman, Paul. / The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?. University of Dundee, 2010. (Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics; 239).
    @techreport{bc9147fcc3bd4ce5bb1e68923f6c9486,
    title = "The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?",
    abstract = "The revival of support for a living wage has reopened a long-run debate over the extent to which active regulation of labour markets may be necessary to attain desired outcomes. Market failure is suggested to result in lower wages and remuneration for low skilled workers than might otherwise be expected from models of perfect competition. This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of living wage campaigns and demonstrates that once we move away from idealised models of perfect competition to one where employers retain power over the bargaining process, such as monopsony, it is readily understandable that low wages may be endemic in low skilled employment contracts. The paper then examines evidence, derived from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey, for the extent to which a living wage will address low pay within the labour force. We highlight the greater incidence of low pay within the private sector and then focus upon the public sector where the Living Wage demand has had most impact. We examine the extent to which addressing low pay within the public sector increases costs. We further highlight the evidence that a predominance of low pay exists among public sector young and women workers (and in particular lone parent women workers) but not, perhaps surprisingly, among workers from ethnic minority backgrounds. The paper then builds upon the results from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey with analysis of the British Household Panel Survey in order to examine the impact the introduction of a living wage, within the public sector, would have in reducing household inequality. The paper concludes that a living wage is indeed an appropriate regulatory response to market failure for low skilled workers and can act to reduce age and gender pay inequality, and reduce household income inequality among in-work households below average earnings.",
    keywords = "Living wage, Poverty, Inequality, Minimum wage",
    author = "Carlo Morelli and Paul Seaman",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",
    series = "Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics",
    publisher = "University of Dundee",
    number = "239",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "University of Dundee",

    }

    Morelli, C & Seaman, P 2010 'The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?' Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics, no. 239, University of Dundee.

    The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK? / Morelli, Carlo; Seaman, Paul.

    University of Dundee, 2010. (Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics; No. 239).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?

    AU - Morelli, Carlo

    AU - Seaman, Paul

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - The revival of support for a living wage has reopened a long-run debate over the extent to which active regulation of labour markets may be necessary to attain desired outcomes. Market failure is suggested to result in lower wages and remuneration for low skilled workers than might otherwise be expected from models of perfect competition. This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of living wage campaigns and demonstrates that once we move away from idealised models of perfect competition to one where employers retain power over the bargaining process, such as monopsony, it is readily understandable that low wages may be endemic in low skilled employment contracts. The paper then examines evidence, derived from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey, for the extent to which a living wage will address low pay within the labour force. We highlight the greater incidence of low pay within the private sector and then focus upon the public sector where the Living Wage demand has had most impact. We examine the extent to which addressing low pay within the public sector increases costs. We further highlight the evidence that a predominance of low pay exists among public sector young and women workers (and in particular lone parent women workers) but not, perhaps surprisingly, among workers from ethnic minority backgrounds. The paper then builds upon the results from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey with analysis of the British Household Panel Survey in order to examine the impact the introduction of a living wage, within the public sector, would have in reducing household inequality. The paper concludes that a living wage is indeed an appropriate regulatory response to market failure for low skilled workers and can act to reduce age and gender pay inequality, and reduce household income inequality among in-work households below average earnings.

    AB - The revival of support for a living wage has reopened a long-run debate over the extent to which active regulation of labour markets may be necessary to attain desired outcomes. Market failure is suggested to result in lower wages and remuneration for low skilled workers than might otherwise be expected from models of perfect competition. This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of living wage campaigns and demonstrates that once we move away from idealised models of perfect competition to one where employers retain power over the bargaining process, such as monopsony, it is readily understandable that low wages may be endemic in low skilled employment contracts. The paper then examines evidence, derived from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey, for the extent to which a living wage will address low pay within the labour force. We highlight the greater incidence of low pay within the private sector and then focus upon the public sector where the Living Wage demand has had most impact. We examine the extent to which addressing low pay within the public sector increases costs. We further highlight the evidence that a predominance of low pay exists among public sector young and women workers (and in particular lone parent women workers) but not, perhaps surprisingly, among workers from ethnic minority backgrounds. The paper then builds upon the results from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey with analysis of the British Household Panel Survey in order to examine the impact the introduction of a living wage, within the public sector, would have in reducing household inequality. The paper concludes that a living wage is indeed an appropriate regulatory response to market failure for low skilled workers and can act to reduce age and gender pay inequality, and reduce household income inequality among in-work households below average earnings.

    KW - Living wage

    KW - Poverty

    KW - Inequality

    KW - Minimum wage

    M3 - Discussion paper

    T3 - Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics

    BT - The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK?

    PB - University of Dundee

    ER -

    Morelli C, Seaman P. The living wage: reducing inequality in the UK? University of Dundee. 2010. (Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics; 239).