The Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire: Further Validation and Evidence of Cross-National Validity

Christian Blötner (Lead / Corresponding author), Bojana M. Dinić, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall, Petar Krstić, Kostas A. Papageorgiou, Cassidy Trahair, Rachel A. Plouffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Researchers on antagonistic personality traits debate about an appropriate measurement approach to Machiavellianism. One measure intended to resolve this discourse, the Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire (MAAQ), distinguishes motivational aspects of Machiavellianism (https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001069). Machiavellian Approach reflects strategic striving for advantages (even at others’ expense), and Machiavellian Avoidance encompasses misanthropically driven prevention of loss. Using two German samples (ntotal = 1,583; 63% women), evidence from our first study confirmed assumed relations between both facets and disagreeableness, as well as Machiavellian approach with dominance seeking, and Machiavellian avoidance with mistrust. However, the nomological networks of Machiavellian approach and measures of subclinical psychopathy were almost identical in both samples. Thus, the MAAQ failed to sufficiently differentiate from subclinical psychopathy. In a second study, partial scalar cross-national invariance was established across samples from Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, and Serbia (ntotal = 1,853). Thereby, participants from Germany scored lower in Machiavellian approach compared to other samples, lower in Machiavellian avoidance compared to samples from the United Kingdom and Canada, but higher compared to the Serbian sample. Overall, findings supported cross-national equivalence of the MAAQ but undermined construct validity.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Early online date2 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Machiavellian Approach and Avoidance Questionnaire: Further Validation and Evidence of Cross-National Validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this