The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity: a registered report

Nathaniel Elkins-Brown (Lead / Corresponding author), Blair Saunders, Michael Inzlicht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
388 Downloads (Pure)


A growing body of work in social and affective neuroscience suggests that emotion plays an instrumental role in error monitoring processes, rather than only a moderating one. High-powered replications of studies that support this idea, however, are lacking. Here, we attempted a preregistered replication of our own study that had provided evidence for the functional role of emotions in error monitoring: that a neural signal of error monitoring—the error-related negativity—is reduced when participants undergo a misattribution of arousal procedure (Inzlicht & Al-Khindi, 2012). Like a previous replication attempt (Rodilla et al, 2016), our misattribution procedure failed to reduce the amplitude of the ERN. However, it also failed its manipulation check to reduce state anxiety, limiting the conclusions we can draw. Nonetheless, these findings are consistent with the view that our original study may have been a false positive. We discuss these findings in the context of the replication crisis in psychology and of work on the emotional properties of the ERN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-140
Number of pages17
Early online date7 Sept 2018
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018


  • Anxiety
  • ERN
  • Emotion
  • Misattribution
  • Replication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity: a registered report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this