The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity: a registered report

Nathaniel Elkins-Brown (Lead / Corresponding author), Blair Saunders, Michael Inzlicht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A growing body of work in social and affective neuroscience suggests that emotion plays an instrumental role in error monitoring processes, rather than only a moderating one. High-powered replications of studies that support this idea, however, are lacking. Here, we attempted a preregistered replication of our own study that had provided evidence for the functional role of emotions in error monitoring: that a neural signal of error monitoring—the error-related negativity—is reduced when participants undergo a misattribution of arousal procedure (Inzlicht & Al-Khindi, 2012). Like a previous replication attempt (Rodilla et al, 2016), our misattribution procedure failed to reduce the amplitude of the ERN. However, it also failed its manipulation check to reduce state anxiety, limiting the conclusions we can draw. Nonetheless, these findings are consistent with the view that our original study may have been a false positive. We discuss these findings in the context of the replication crisis in psychology and of work on the emotional properties of the ERN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-140
Number of pages17
JournalCortex
Volume109
Early online date7 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Emotions
Neurosciences
Arousal
Anxiety
Psychology

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • ERN
  • Emotion
  • Misattribution
  • Replication

Cite this

Elkins-Brown, Nathaniel ; Saunders, Blair ; Inzlicht, Michael. / The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity : a registered report. In: Cortex. 2018 ; Vol. 109. pp. 124-140.
@article{b235c8b9481a4abb8e628a24e33ba68d,
title = "The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity: a registered report",
abstract = "A growing body of work in social and affective neuroscience suggests that emotion plays an instrumental role in error monitoring processes, rather than only a moderating one. High-powered replications of studies that support this idea, however, are lacking. Here, we attempted a preregistered replication of our own study that had provided evidence for the functional role of emotions in error monitoring: that a neural signal of error monitoring—the error-related negativity—is reduced when participants undergo a misattribution of arousal procedure (Inzlicht & Al-Khindi, 2012). Like a previous replication attempt (Rodilla et al, 2016), our misattribution procedure failed to reduce the amplitude of the ERN. However, it also failed its manipulation check to reduce state anxiety, limiting the conclusions we can draw. Nonetheless, these findings are consistent with the view that our original study may have been a false positive. We discuss these findings in the context of the replication crisis in psychology and of work on the emotional properties of the ERN.",
keywords = "Anxiety, ERN, Emotion, Misattribution, Replication",
author = "Nathaniel Elkins-Brown and Blair Saunders and Michael Inzlicht",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "124--140",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity : a registered report. / Elkins-Brown, Nathaniel (Lead / Corresponding author); Saunders, Blair; Inzlicht, Michael.

In: Cortex, Vol. 109, 12.2018, p. 124-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The misattribution of emotions and the error-related negativity

T2 - a registered report

AU - Elkins-Brown, Nathaniel

AU - Saunders, Blair

AU - Inzlicht, Michael

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - A growing body of work in social and affective neuroscience suggests that emotion plays an instrumental role in error monitoring processes, rather than only a moderating one. High-powered replications of studies that support this idea, however, are lacking. Here, we attempted a preregistered replication of our own study that had provided evidence for the functional role of emotions in error monitoring: that a neural signal of error monitoring—the error-related negativity—is reduced when participants undergo a misattribution of arousal procedure (Inzlicht & Al-Khindi, 2012). Like a previous replication attempt (Rodilla et al, 2016), our misattribution procedure failed to reduce the amplitude of the ERN. However, it also failed its manipulation check to reduce state anxiety, limiting the conclusions we can draw. Nonetheless, these findings are consistent with the view that our original study may have been a false positive. We discuss these findings in the context of the replication crisis in psychology and of work on the emotional properties of the ERN.

AB - A growing body of work in social and affective neuroscience suggests that emotion plays an instrumental role in error monitoring processes, rather than only a moderating one. High-powered replications of studies that support this idea, however, are lacking. Here, we attempted a preregistered replication of our own study that had provided evidence for the functional role of emotions in error monitoring: that a neural signal of error monitoring—the error-related negativity—is reduced when participants undergo a misattribution of arousal procedure (Inzlicht & Al-Khindi, 2012). Like a previous replication attempt (Rodilla et al, 2016), our misattribution procedure failed to reduce the amplitude of the ERN. However, it also failed its manipulation check to reduce state anxiety, limiting the conclusions we can draw. Nonetheless, these findings are consistent with the view that our original study may have been a false positive. We discuss these findings in the context of the replication crisis in psychology and of work on the emotional properties of the ERN.

KW - Anxiety

KW - ERN

KW - Emotion

KW - Misattribution

KW - Replication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054445352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 30316113

VL - 109

SP - 124

EP - 140

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -