The National Pain Audit for specialist pain services in England and Wales 2010–2014

Cathy Price, Amanda C. de C Williams, Blair H. Smith, Alex Bottle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous reports highlight variations in pain clinic provision between services, particularly in the provision of multidisciplinary services and length of waiting times. A National Audit aims to identify and quantify these variations, to facilitate raising standards of care in identified areas of need. This article describes a Quality Improvement Programme cycle covering England and Wales that used such an approach to remedy the paucity of data on the current state of UK pain clinics. Methods: Clinics were audited over a 4-year period using standards developed by the Faculty of Pain Medicine of The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Reporting was according to guidance from a recent systematic review of national surveys of pain clinics. A range of quality improvement measures was introduced via a series of roadshows led by the British Pain Society. Results: 94% of clinics responded to the first audit and 83% responded to the second. Per annum, 0.4% of the total national population was estimated to attend a specialist pain service. A significant improvement in multidisciplinary staffing was found (35–56%, p < 0.001) over the 4-year audit programme, although this still requires improvement. Very few clinics achieved recommended evidence-based waiting times, although only 2.5% fell outside government targets; this did not improve. Safety standards were generally met. Clinicians often failed to code diagnoses. Conclusion: A National Audit found that while generally safe many specialist pain services in England and Wales fell below recommended standards of care. Waiting times and staffing require improvement if patients are to get effective and timely care. Diagnostic coding also requires improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-193
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Pain
Volume13
Issue number3
Early online date7 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Pain Clinics
Wales
England
Standard of Care
Quality Improvement
Pain
Medicine
Safety
Population

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • intractable
  • pain
  • pain clinics
  • pain measurement

Cite this

Price, Cathy ; de C Williams, Amanda C. ; Smith, Blair H. ; Bottle, Alex. / The National Pain Audit for specialist pain services in England and Wales 2010–2014. In: British Journal of Pain. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 185-193.
@article{e25514e886d8427c9ec6e8d1e45e8062,
title = "The National Pain Audit for specialist pain services in England and Wales 2010–2014",
abstract = "Introduction: Numerous reports highlight variations in pain clinic provision between services, particularly in the provision of multidisciplinary services and length of waiting times. A National Audit aims to identify and quantify these variations, to facilitate raising standards of care in identified areas of need. This article describes a Quality Improvement Programme cycle covering England and Wales that used such an approach to remedy the paucity of data on the current state of UK pain clinics. Methods: Clinics were audited over a 4-year period using standards developed by the Faculty of Pain Medicine of The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Reporting was according to guidance from a recent systematic review of national surveys of pain clinics. A range of quality improvement measures was introduced via a series of roadshows led by the British Pain Society. Results: 94{\%} of clinics responded to the first audit and 83{\%} responded to the second. Per annum, 0.4{\%} of the total national population was estimated to attend a specialist pain service. A significant improvement in multidisciplinary staffing was found (35–56{\%}, p < 0.001) over the 4-year audit programme, although this still requires improvement. Very few clinics achieved recommended evidence-based waiting times, although only 2.5{\%} fell outside government targets; this did not improve. Safety standards were generally met. Clinicians often failed to code diagnoses. Conclusion: A National Audit found that while generally safe many specialist pain services in England and Wales fell below recommended standards of care. Waiting times and staffing require improvement if patients are to get effective and timely care. Diagnostic coding also requires improvement.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, intractable, pain, pain clinics, pain measurement",
author = "Cathy Price and {de C Williams}, {Amanda C.} and Smith, {Blair H.} and Alex Bottle",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2049463718814277",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "185--193",
journal = "British Journal of Pain",
issn = "2049-4637",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

The National Pain Audit for specialist pain services in England and Wales 2010–2014. / Price, Cathy; de C Williams, Amanda C.; Smith, Blair H.; Bottle, Alex.

In: British Journal of Pain, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.08.2019, p. 185-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The National Pain Audit for specialist pain services in England and Wales 2010–2014

AU - Price, Cathy

AU - de C Williams, Amanda C.

AU - Smith, Blair H.

AU - Bottle, Alex

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Introduction: Numerous reports highlight variations in pain clinic provision between services, particularly in the provision of multidisciplinary services and length of waiting times. A National Audit aims to identify and quantify these variations, to facilitate raising standards of care in identified areas of need. This article describes a Quality Improvement Programme cycle covering England and Wales that used such an approach to remedy the paucity of data on the current state of UK pain clinics. Methods: Clinics were audited over a 4-year period using standards developed by the Faculty of Pain Medicine of The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Reporting was according to guidance from a recent systematic review of national surveys of pain clinics. A range of quality improvement measures was introduced via a series of roadshows led by the British Pain Society. Results: 94% of clinics responded to the first audit and 83% responded to the second. Per annum, 0.4% of the total national population was estimated to attend a specialist pain service. A significant improvement in multidisciplinary staffing was found (35–56%, p < 0.001) over the 4-year audit programme, although this still requires improvement. Very few clinics achieved recommended evidence-based waiting times, although only 2.5% fell outside government targets; this did not improve. Safety standards were generally met. Clinicians often failed to code diagnoses. Conclusion: A National Audit found that while generally safe many specialist pain services in England and Wales fell below recommended standards of care. Waiting times and staffing require improvement if patients are to get effective and timely care. Diagnostic coding also requires improvement.

AB - Introduction: Numerous reports highlight variations in pain clinic provision between services, particularly in the provision of multidisciplinary services and length of waiting times. A National Audit aims to identify and quantify these variations, to facilitate raising standards of care in identified areas of need. This article describes a Quality Improvement Programme cycle covering England and Wales that used such an approach to remedy the paucity of data on the current state of UK pain clinics. Methods: Clinics were audited over a 4-year period using standards developed by the Faculty of Pain Medicine of The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Reporting was according to guidance from a recent systematic review of national surveys of pain clinics. A range of quality improvement measures was introduced via a series of roadshows led by the British Pain Society. Results: 94% of clinics responded to the first audit and 83% responded to the second. Per annum, 0.4% of the total national population was estimated to attend a specialist pain service. A significant improvement in multidisciplinary staffing was found (35–56%, p < 0.001) over the 4-year audit programme, although this still requires improvement. Very few clinics achieved recommended evidence-based waiting times, although only 2.5% fell outside government targets; this did not improve. Safety standards were generally met. Clinicians often failed to code diagnoses. Conclusion: A National Audit found that while generally safe many specialist pain services in England and Wales fell below recommended standards of care. Waiting times and staffing require improvement if patients are to get effective and timely care. Diagnostic coding also requires improvement.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - intractable

KW - pain

KW - pain clinics

KW - pain measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058627123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2049463718814277

DO - 10.1177/2049463718814277

M3 - Article

C2 - 31308943

AN - SCOPUS:85058627123

VL - 13

SP - 185

EP - 193

JO - British Journal of Pain

JF - British Journal of Pain

SN - 2049-4637

IS - 3

ER -