The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review

R. Santhirapala (Lead / Corresponding author), J. Partridge, C. J. MacEwen

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    The increasing age and subsequent medical complexity of patients presenting for surgery grants the opportunity to examine the processes and delivery of peri-operative care. There is a need to redesign peri-operative pathways allowing room for shared decision making and personalised, evidence-based care. In times of financial constraint, this is no easy task. However, neglecting to transform services now may lead to challenges in the sustainability of the provision of peri-operative care in the long-term. Challenges in redesigning peri-operative care pathways include identification and optimisation of those at highest peri-operative risk to inform the difficult conversations surrounding the appropriateness of surgery. The moral burden of these conversations on patient and professionals alike is increasingly recognised and managing this issue requires innovative models of collaborative, multidisciplinary and interprofessional working. To operate or not can be a challenging question to answer with a number of different perspectives to consider; not least that of the patient.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e46-e53
    Number of pages9
    JournalAnaesthesia
    Volume75
    Issue numberS1
    Early online date5 Jan 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    Organized Financing
    Long-Term Care
    Decision Making

    Keywords

    • frailty
    • peri-operative care
    • peri-operative medicine
    • prehabilitation
    • risk assessment
    • shared decision making
    • Surgical Procedures, Operative
    • Humans
    • Risk
    • Refusal to Treat
    • Clinical Decision-Making/methods
    • Aged, 80 and over
    • Aged

    Cite this

    Santhirapala, R. ; Partridge, J. ; MacEwen, C. J. / The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review. In: Anaesthesia. 2020 ; Vol. 75, No. S1. pp. e46-e53.
    @article{8d7991f5f4ce442791d9e33d0a97da04,
    title = "The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review",
    abstract = "The increasing age and subsequent medical complexity of patients presenting for surgery grants the opportunity to examine the processes and delivery of peri-operative care. There is a need to redesign peri-operative pathways allowing room for shared decision making and personalised, evidence-based care. In times of financial constraint, this is no easy task. However, neglecting to transform services now may lead to challenges in the sustainability of the provision of peri-operative care in the long-term. Challenges in redesigning peri-operative care pathways include identification and optimisation of those at highest peri-operative risk to inform the difficult conversations surrounding the appropriateness of surgery. The moral burden of these conversations on patient and professionals alike is increasingly recognised and managing this issue requires innovative models of collaborative, multidisciplinary and interprofessional working. To operate or not can be a challenging question to answer with a number of different perspectives to consider; not least that of the patient.",
    keywords = "frailty, peri-operative care, peri-operative medicine, prehabilitation, risk assessment, shared decision making, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Humans, Risk, Refusal to Treat, Clinical Decision-Making/methods, Aged, 80 and over, Aged",
    author = "R. Santhirapala and J. Partridge and MacEwen, {C. J.}",
    note = "{\circledC} 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.",
    year = "2020",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/anae.14910",
    language = "English",
    volume = "75",
    pages = "e46--e53",
    journal = "Anaesthesia",
    issn = "0003-2409",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "S1",

    }

    Santhirapala, R, Partridge, J & MacEwen, CJ 2020, 'The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review', Anaesthesia, vol. 75, no. S1, pp. e46-e53. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14910

    The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review. / Santhirapala, R. (Lead / Corresponding author); Partridge, J.; MacEwen, C. J.

    In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 75, No. S1, 01.2020, p. e46-e53.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The older surgical patient – to operate or not? A state of the art review

    AU - Santhirapala, R.

    AU - Partridge, J.

    AU - MacEwen, C. J.

    N1 - © 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.

    PY - 2020/1

    Y1 - 2020/1

    N2 - The increasing age and subsequent medical complexity of patients presenting for surgery grants the opportunity to examine the processes and delivery of peri-operative care. There is a need to redesign peri-operative pathways allowing room for shared decision making and personalised, evidence-based care. In times of financial constraint, this is no easy task. However, neglecting to transform services now may lead to challenges in the sustainability of the provision of peri-operative care in the long-term. Challenges in redesigning peri-operative care pathways include identification and optimisation of those at highest peri-operative risk to inform the difficult conversations surrounding the appropriateness of surgery. The moral burden of these conversations on patient and professionals alike is increasingly recognised and managing this issue requires innovative models of collaborative, multidisciplinary and interprofessional working. To operate or not can be a challenging question to answer with a number of different perspectives to consider; not least that of the patient.

    AB - The increasing age and subsequent medical complexity of patients presenting for surgery grants the opportunity to examine the processes and delivery of peri-operative care. There is a need to redesign peri-operative pathways allowing room for shared decision making and personalised, evidence-based care. In times of financial constraint, this is no easy task. However, neglecting to transform services now may lead to challenges in the sustainability of the provision of peri-operative care in the long-term. Challenges in redesigning peri-operative care pathways include identification and optimisation of those at highest peri-operative risk to inform the difficult conversations surrounding the appropriateness of surgery. The moral burden of these conversations on patient and professionals alike is increasingly recognised and managing this issue requires innovative models of collaborative, multidisciplinary and interprofessional working. To operate or not can be a challenging question to answer with a number of different perspectives to consider; not least that of the patient.

    KW - frailty

    KW - peri-operative care

    KW - peri-operative medicine

    KW - prehabilitation

    KW - risk assessment

    KW - shared decision making

    KW - Surgical Procedures, Operative

    KW - Humans

    KW - Risk

    KW - Refusal to Treat

    KW - Clinical Decision-Making/methods

    KW - Aged, 80 and over

    KW - Aged

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077315682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/anae.14910

    DO - 10.1111/anae.14910

    M3 - Review article

    C2 - 31903565

    AN - SCOPUS:85077315682

    VL - 75

    SP - e46-e53

    JO - Anaesthesia

    JF - Anaesthesia

    SN - 0003-2409

    IS - S1

    ER -