The Range and Limitation of Sub-National Regime Variations under Electoral Authoritarianism: The Case of Russia

Peter Panov (Lead / Corresponding author), Cameron Ross (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As has been demonstrated by scholars, different levels of a polity may encompass different political regimes. In this study we examine variations in regional political regimes which have developed under Russia's system of electoral authoritarianism. Comparing the results of two cycles of regional assembly elections (2008–12 and 2013–17) we analyse and compare elections results and levels of electoral contestation in both the party list (PL) and single member district (SMD) contests. This allows us to identify the range of sub-national regime variations: ‘hegemonic authoritarian’, ‘inter-elite bargain authoritarian’, ‘clearly-competitive authoritarian’, and ‘moderately-competitive authoritarian’ regions. Approximately half of the regions demonstrate stable electoral patterns across both cycles. At the same time, none of the regions go beyond the authoritarian limitations imposed by the Russian regime. The variation is explained by a combination of structural and agency factors with a prevalence of the latter.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalRegional and Federal Studies
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

authoritarianism
Russia
political regime
regime
election
election result
elite
district

Keywords

  • Regional elections
  • Russia
  • electoral authoritarianism
  • single mandate districts

Cite this

@article{c5eb5a6b85854e67a0fd23c055d8ac83,
title = "The Range and Limitation of Sub-National Regime Variations under Electoral Authoritarianism: The Case of Russia",
abstract = "As has been demonstrated by scholars, different levels of a polity may encompass different political regimes. In this study we examine variations in regional political regimes which have developed under Russia's system of electoral authoritarianism. Comparing the results of two cycles of regional assembly elections (2008–12 and 2013–17) we analyse and compare elections results and levels of electoral contestation in both the party list (PL) and single member district (SMD) contests. This allows us to identify the range of sub-national regime variations: ‘hegemonic authoritarian’, ‘inter-elite bargain authoritarian’, ‘clearly-competitive authoritarian’, and ‘moderately-competitive authoritarian’ regions. Approximately half of the regions demonstrate stable electoral patterns across both cycles. At the same time, none of the regions go beyond the authoritarian limitations imposed by the Russian regime. The variation is explained by a combination of structural and agency factors with a prevalence of the latter.",
keywords = "Regional elections, Russia, electoral authoritarianism, single mandate districts",
author = "Peter Panov and Cameron Ross",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/13597566.2018.1530221",
language = "English",
journal = "Regional and Federal Studies",
issn = "1359-7566",
publisher = "Informa UK Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Range and Limitation of Sub-National Regime Variations under Electoral Authoritarianism

T2 - The Case of Russia

AU - Panov, Peter

AU - Ross, Cameron

PY - 2018/10/10

Y1 - 2018/10/10

N2 - As has been demonstrated by scholars, different levels of a polity may encompass different political regimes. In this study we examine variations in regional political regimes which have developed under Russia's system of electoral authoritarianism. Comparing the results of two cycles of regional assembly elections (2008–12 and 2013–17) we analyse and compare elections results and levels of electoral contestation in both the party list (PL) and single member district (SMD) contests. This allows us to identify the range of sub-national regime variations: ‘hegemonic authoritarian’, ‘inter-elite bargain authoritarian’, ‘clearly-competitive authoritarian’, and ‘moderately-competitive authoritarian’ regions. Approximately half of the regions demonstrate stable electoral patterns across both cycles. At the same time, none of the regions go beyond the authoritarian limitations imposed by the Russian regime. The variation is explained by a combination of structural and agency factors with a prevalence of the latter.

AB - As has been demonstrated by scholars, different levels of a polity may encompass different political regimes. In this study we examine variations in regional political regimes which have developed under Russia's system of electoral authoritarianism. Comparing the results of two cycles of regional assembly elections (2008–12 and 2013–17) we analyse and compare elections results and levels of electoral contestation in both the party list (PL) and single member district (SMD) contests. This allows us to identify the range of sub-national regime variations: ‘hegemonic authoritarian’, ‘inter-elite bargain authoritarian’, ‘clearly-competitive authoritarian’, and ‘moderately-competitive authoritarian’ regions. Approximately half of the regions demonstrate stable electoral patterns across both cycles. At the same time, none of the regions go beyond the authoritarian limitations imposed by the Russian regime. The variation is explained by a combination of structural and agency factors with a prevalence of the latter.

KW - Regional elections

KW - Russia

KW - electoral authoritarianism

KW - single mandate districts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054638106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13597566.2018.1530221

DO - 10.1080/13597566.2018.1530221

M3 - Article

JO - Regional and Federal Studies

JF - Regional and Federal Studies

SN - 1359-7566

ER -