The role of dialog in philosophy for children

K. J. Topping (Lead / Corresponding author), S. Trickey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Philosophy for Children (P4C) stems from the work of Mathew Lipman. It involves teacher modeling of exploratory talk in relation to a complex stimulus, then has students discuss together in pairs, larger groups, and the whole class to achieve consensus. The effects of P4C on quantity and quality of interactive dialog on 180 10-year-old children in primary (elementary) mainstream classes in Scotland were investigated. Video recordings of teacher-led and pupil-pupil classroom dialog before, and seven months into, participation in the program were analyzed. Changes in intervention classes included: increased use of open-ended questions by the teacher, increased participation of pupils in classroom dialog, and improved pupil reasoning in justification of opinions. There were no changes in comparison classes. Increases were found in the amount of teacher-student dialog and the amount of student-student dialog, with decreases in the amount of teacher-whole-class talk. This study found gains in cognition, which were sustained from elementary school into high school even when no further P4C was done. Socio-emotional aspects of learning also improved. Investigation of process found changes in teacher behavior and child behavior. Implications for future research, policy and practice are outlined, particularly for enhancing consistency and expanding the program.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)69-78
    Number of pages10
    JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
    Volume63
    Early online date4 Feb 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    dialogue
    pupil
    teacher
    classroom
    teachers' behavior
    participation
    video recording
    student
    student teacher
    elementary school
    cognition
    stimulus
    philosophy
    school
    learning
    Group

    Cite this

    @article{9b2184878bc34546863633d272108aab,
    title = "The role of dialog in philosophy for children",
    abstract = "Philosophy for Children (P4C) stems from the work of Mathew Lipman. It involves teacher modeling of exploratory talk in relation to a complex stimulus, then has students discuss together in pairs, larger groups, and the whole class to achieve consensus. The effects of P4C on quantity and quality of interactive dialog on 180 10-year-old children in primary (elementary) mainstream classes in Scotland were investigated. Video recordings of teacher-led and pupil-pupil classroom dialog before, and seven months into, participation in the program were analyzed. Changes in intervention classes included: increased use of open-ended questions by the teacher, increased participation of pupils in classroom dialog, and improved pupil reasoning in justification of opinions. There were no changes in comparison classes. Increases were found in the amount of teacher-student dialog and the amount of student-student dialog, with decreases in the amount of teacher-whole-class talk. This study found gains in cognition, which were sustained from elementary school into high school even when no further P4C was done. Socio-emotional aspects of learning also improved. Investigation of process found changes in teacher behavior and child behavior. Implications for future research, policy and practice are outlined, particularly for enhancing consistency and expanding the program.",
    author = "Topping, {K. J.} and S. Trickey",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "69--78",
    journal = "International Journal of Educational Research",
    issn = "0883-0355",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    The role of dialog in philosophy for children. / Topping, K. J. (Lead / Corresponding author); Trickey, S.

    In: International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 63, 2014, p. 69-78.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The role of dialog in philosophy for children

    AU - Topping, K. J.

    AU - Trickey, S.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Philosophy for Children (P4C) stems from the work of Mathew Lipman. It involves teacher modeling of exploratory talk in relation to a complex stimulus, then has students discuss together in pairs, larger groups, and the whole class to achieve consensus. The effects of P4C on quantity and quality of interactive dialog on 180 10-year-old children in primary (elementary) mainstream classes in Scotland were investigated. Video recordings of teacher-led and pupil-pupil classroom dialog before, and seven months into, participation in the program were analyzed. Changes in intervention classes included: increased use of open-ended questions by the teacher, increased participation of pupils in classroom dialog, and improved pupil reasoning in justification of opinions. There were no changes in comparison classes. Increases were found in the amount of teacher-student dialog and the amount of student-student dialog, with decreases in the amount of teacher-whole-class talk. This study found gains in cognition, which were sustained from elementary school into high school even when no further P4C was done. Socio-emotional aspects of learning also improved. Investigation of process found changes in teacher behavior and child behavior. Implications for future research, policy and practice are outlined, particularly for enhancing consistency and expanding the program.

    AB - Philosophy for Children (P4C) stems from the work of Mathew Lipman. It involves teacher modeling of exploratory talk in relation to a complex stimulus, then has students discuss together in pairs, larger groups, and the whole class to achieve consensus. The effects of P4C on quantity and quality of interactive dialog on 180 10-year-old children in primary (elementary) mainstream classes in Scotland were investigated. Video recordings of teacher-led and pupil-pupil classroom dialog before, and seven months into, participation in the program were analyzed. Changes in intervention classes included: increased use of open-ended questions by the teacher, increased participation of pupils in classroom dialog, and improved pupil reasoning in justification of opinions. There were no changes in comparison classes. Increases were found in the amount of teacher-student dialog and the amount of student-student dialog, with decreases in the amount of teacher-whole-class talk. This study found gains in cognition, which were sustained from elementary school into high school even when no further P4C was done. Socio-emotional aspects of learning also improved. Investigation of process found changes in teacher behavior and child behavior. Implications for future research, policy and practice are outlined, particularly for enhancing consistency and expanding the program.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888036665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.002

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84888036665

    VL - 63

    SP - 69

    EP - 78

    JO - International Journal of Educational Research

    JF - International Journal of Educational Research

    SN - 0883-0355

    ER -