The role of reasonableness in assessing equitable and reasonable use

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between "equitable" and "reasonable" in the law of international watercourses. The analysis will be informed by two of the key distillations of international water law: the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, and associated commentary; the Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Water of International Rivers. The analysis will also reflect on relevant experience from the U.S.A. through its application of equitable apportionment in inter-state conflicts, through eastern state practice in implementing riparian rights regimes, and through the western concept of beneficial use. The paper seeks to identify the role of reasonableness in assessing the extent of riparian states’ rights to Transboundary watercourses. The paper concludes that equity and reasonableness have distinct and separate roles to play, but that they cannot be analysed in isolation of the concept of beneficial uses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)22
    Number of pages1
    JournalYmparistojuridiikka
    Volume1
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    reasonableness
    water
    Law
    social isolation
    UNO
    equity
    river
    experience

    Cite this

    @article{339e426ee5ef4ffdaac2ee1c32a5587b,
    title = "The role of reasonableness in assessing equitable and reasonable use",
    abstract = "The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between {"}equitable{"} and {"}reasonable{"} in the law of international watercourses. The analysis will be informed by two of the key distillations of international water law: the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, and associated commentary; the Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Water of International Rivers. The analysis will also reflect on relevant experience from the U.S.A. through its application of equitable apportionment in inter-state conflicts, through eastern state practice in implementing riparian rights regimes, and through the western concept of beneficial use. The paper seeks to identify the role of reasonableness in assessing the extent of riparian states’ rights to Transboundary watercourses. The paper concludes that equity and reasonableness have distinct and separate roles to play, but that they cannot be analysed in isolation of the concept of beneficial uses.",
    author = "Andrew Allan",
    note = "dc.publisher: Finnish Society for Environmental Law",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "22",
    journal = "Ymparistojuridiikka",
    issn = "0358-6944",

    }

    The role of reasonableness in assessing equitable and reasonable use. / Allan, Andrew.

    In: Ymparistojuridiikka, Vol. 1, 2009, p. 22.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The role of reasonableness in assessing equitable and reasonable use

    AU - Allan, Andrew

    N1 - dc.publisher: Finnish Society for Environmental Law

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between "equitable" and "reasonable" in the law of international watercourses. The analysis will be informed by two of the key distillations of international water law: the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, and associated commentary; the Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Water of International Rivers. The analysis will also reflect on relevant experience from the U.S.A. through its application of equitable apportionment in inter-state conflicts, through eastern state practice in implementing riparian rights regimes, and through the western concept of beneficial use. The paper seeks to identify the role of reasonableness in assessing the extent of riparian states’ rights to Transboundary watercourses. The paper concludes that equity and reasonableness have distinct and separate roles to play, but that they cannot be analysed in isolation of the concept of beneficial uses.

    AB - The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between "equitable" and "reasonable" in the law of international watercourses. The analysis will be informed by two of the key distillations of international water law: the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, and associated commentary; the Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Water of International Rivers. The analysis will also reflect on relevant experience from the U.S.A. through its application of equitable apportionment in inter-state conflicts, through eastern state practice in implementing riparian rights regimes, and through the western concept of beneficial use. The paper seeks to identify the role of reasonableness in assessing the extent of riparian states’ rights to Transboundary watercourses. The paper concludes that equity and reasonableness have distinct and separate roles to play, but that they cannot be analysed in isolation of the concept of beneficial uses.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 22

    JO - Ymparistojuridiikka

    JF - Ymparistojuridiikka

    SN - 0358-6944

    ER -