Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to propose a metatheoretical framework for understanding the practice of social theorising. I argue that the latter fundamentally consists of engaging with binary distinctions, concepts and typologies. Design/methodology/approach – I combine pragmatic, systems-theoretical and critical-theoretical perspectives to discuss each of these three types of social-theoretical activity, paying particular attention to the foundational role of binaries. Findings – I apply my metatheoretical framework to critical social theorising by demonstrating how engaging with binaries, concepts and typologies is used to explore power with the aim of exposing oppressive structures and fostering agency within historically contingent social systems. I pay particular attention to engaging with binaries, concepts and typologies in disability studies, my specialist area. Originality/value – The analysis adds theoretical, methodological and pedagogical value. Theoretically, it strengthens metatheorising in social sciences, helping illuminate the basic building blocks or the “source code” of a theory; methodologically, it makes explicit the rules of engagement that organise theorising; and pedagogically, it demystifies social theorising, making the practice easier to teach and learn.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Information Technology & People |
| Early online date | 24 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24 Apr 2026 |
Keywords
- binary distinctions
- critical theory
- metatheory
- pragmatism
- systems theory
- disability studies
- methodology
- George Spencer-Brown
- Methodology
- Pragmatism
- Binary distinctions
- Systems theory
- Critical theory
- Metatheory
- Disability studies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems
- Computer Science Applications
- Library and Information Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The source code of social theorising: engaging with binary distinctions, concepts, and typologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver