Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-1994 definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is very broad, and there have been suggestions that it lacks specificity. To test this, we have compared three groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the criteria but self-report different etiologies.
Methods
Patients with self-reported symptoms which developed sporadically (sCFS, n = 48); after Gulf War service (GW, n = 24); and following exposure to organophosphate insecticides (OP, n = 25) underwent a clinical examination, completed the MOS SF-36 quality of life and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scales, and were assessed for major and minor criteria for CDC-1994 CFS.
Results
Significant differences in simple clinical measures and outcome measures were observed between groups. The GW group had significantly more severe physical symptoms—fatigue, muscle and multi-joint pain—than OP or sCFS, and the sCFS group was significantly less impaired than the other two groups in terms of role emotional and mental health. In all three groups, a majority of patients exhibited muscle weakness in the lower limbs, and significant numbers of patients had absent or abnormal reflexes.
Conclusions
Differences in simple, easily performed clinical outcome measurements can be observed between groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the CDC-1994 criteria for CFS. It is likely that their response to treatment may also vary. The specificity of the CFS case definition should be improved to define more homogeneous groups of patients for the purposes of treatment and research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-100 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Annals of Epidemiology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2004 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
The specificity of the CDC-1994 criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome : comparison of health status in three groups of patients who fulfill the criteria. / Kennedy, Gwen; Abbot, Neil C.; Spence, Vance; Underwood, Christine; Belch, Jill J. F.
In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 95-100.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - The specificity of the CDC-1994 criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome
T2 - comparison of health status in three groups of patients who fulfill the criteria
AU - Kennedy, Gwen
AU - Abbot, Neil C.
AU - Spence, Vance
AU - Underwood, Christine
AU - Belch, Jill J. F.
PY - 2004/2
Y1 - 2004/2
N2 - PurposeThe Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-1994 definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is very broad, and there have been suggestions that it lacks specificity. To test this, we have compared three groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the criteria but self-report different etiologies.MethodsPatients with self-reported symptoms which developed sporadically (sCFS, n = 48); after Gulf War service (GW, n = 24); and following exposure to organophosphate insecticides (OP, n = 25) underwent a clinical examination, completed the MOS SF-36 quality of life and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scales, and were assessed for major and minor criteria for CDC-1994 CFS.ResultsSignificant differences in simple clinical measures and outcome measures were observed between groups. The GW group had significantly more severe physical symptoms—fatigue, muscle and multi-joint pain—than OP or sCFS, and the sCFS group was significantly less impaired than the other two groups in terms of role emotional and mental health. In all three groups, a majority of patients exhibited muscle weakness in the lower limbs, and significant numbers of patients had absent or abnormal reflexes.ConclusionsDifferences in simple, easily performed clinical outcome measurements can be observed between groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the CDC-1994 criteria for CFS. It is likely that their response to treatment may also vary. The specificity of the CFS case definition should be improved to define more homogeneous groups of patients for the purposes of treatment and research.
AB - PurposeThe Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-1994 definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is very broad, and there have been suggestions that it lacks specificity. To test this, we have compared three groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the criteria but self-report different etiologies.MethodsPatients with self-reported symptoms which developed sporadically (sCFS, n = 48); after Gulf War service (GW, n = 24); and following exposure to organophosphate insecticides (OP, n = 25) underwent a clinical examination, completed the MOS SF-36 quality of life and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scales, and were assessed for major and minor criteria for CDC-1994 CFS.ResultsSignificant differences in simple clinical measures and outcome measures were observed between groups. The GW group had significantly more severe physical symptoms—fatigue, muscle and multi-joint pain—than OP or sCFS, and the sCFS group was significantly less impaired than the other two groups in terms of role emotional and mental health. In all three groups, a majority of patients exhibited muscle weakness in the lower limbs, and significant numbers of patients had absent or abnormal reflexes.ConclusionsDifferences in simple, easily performed clinical outcome measurements can be observed between groups of patients, all of whom fulfill the CDC-1994 criteria for CFS. It is likely that their response to treatment may also vary. The specificity of the CFS case definition should be improved to define more homogeneous groups of patients for the purposes of treatment and research.
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.10.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 15018881
VL - 14
SP - 95
EP - 100
JO - Annals of Epidemiology
JF - Annals of Epidemiology
SN - 1047-2797
IS - 2
ER -