Abstract
The paper proposes a new perspective on modelling ad hominem (AH) techniques in a dialogue. The approach is built upon the following assumptions: (i) that ad hominem is not an inferential, but undercutting structure; (ii) that it can be a non-fallacious dialectical technique in some communicative contexts; and (iii) that critical questions in Walton's AH scheme can be used to determine strategies of defending against AH attack. We aim to achieve two goals in this paper: first, to represent the deep ontological structure of dialogues with the speaker's character attacks and defense; and second, to design a game AdHD in which a personal attack, and defense against it, are legitimate dialogue moves.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Computational Models of Argument |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of COMMA 2012 |
Editors | Bart Verheij, Stefan Szeider, Stefan Woltran |
Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 410-421 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781614991113 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781614991106 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Event | Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument - Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria Duration: 10 Sept 2012 → 12 Sept 2012 http://www.kr.tuwien.ac.at/events/comma2012/ |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS Press |
Volume | 245 |
Conference
Conference | Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | COMMA 2012 |
Country/Territory | Austria |
City | Vienna |
Period | 10/09/12 → 12/09/12 |
Internet address |