The use of presumptions and duties in sustainable development equations: promoting micro-renewables and preserving historic buildings

Andrea Ross (Lead / Corresponding author), Agne Zasinaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sustainable development provides a forum for sometimes complementary, but often conflicting, factors to be raised and the best solution found. As new challenges present themselves, they need to fit into our decision-making processes. This paper examines role of presumptions and duties in what it refers to as ‘sustainable development equations’. More specifically, it asks whether the regulatory regime for managing change in listed buildings is promoting and delivering the sustainable management of listed buildings. It does so by examining how the various legal and policy presumptions and duties set out above are used and prioritized by the courts, by Historic Environment Scotland (‘HES’) and local authorities in specific policy on managing change in listed buildings particularly in relation to micro-renewables projects and then in practice by local authorities in listed building consent decisions relating to solar panels. The paper concludes presumptions and duties are useful tools for ensuring certain factors and challenges are brought into sustainable development equations and given the appropriate status. However, in the context of listed buildings, the current balance is not capable of delivering or encouraging their sustainable management. Presumptions and duties are most useful when expressly part of particular regulatory regimes and where the policy that supports these sustainable development equations is sufficiently detailed to provide both regulators and the regulated with reassurance and certainty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-112
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Law Review
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date21 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

historic building
sustainable development
decision making
policy
local authority

Keywords

  • Listed buildings
  • Presumption in favour of preservation
  • Sustainable development
  • Scotland
  • Climate change
  • Sustainable development equations

Cite this

@article{02d1290e6c1a493f811849825037221d,
title = "The use of presumptions and duties in sustainable development equations: promoting micro-renewables and preserving historic buildings",
abstract = "Sustainable development provides a forum for sometimes complementary, but often conflicting, factors to be raised and the best solution found. As new challenges present themselves, they need to fit into our decision-making processes. This paper examines role of presumptions and duties in what it refers to as ‘sustainable development equations’. More specifically, it asks whether the regulatory regime for managing change in listed buildings is promoting and delivering the sustainable management of listed buildings. It does so by examining how the various legal and policy presumptions and duties set out above are used and prioritized by the courts, by Historic Environment Scotland (‘HES’) and local authorities in specific policy on managing change in listed buildings particularly in relation to micro-renewables projects and then in practice by local authorities in listed building consent decisions relating to solar panels. The paper concludes presumptions and duties are useful tools for ensuring certain factors and challenges are brought into sustainable development equations and given the appropriate status. However, in the context of listed buildings, the current balance is not capable of delivering or encouraging their sustainable management. Presumptions and duties are most useful when expressly part of particular regulatory regimes and where the policy that supports these sustainable development equations is sufficiently detailed to provide both regulators and the regulated with reassurance and certainty.",
keywords = "Listed buildings, Presumption in favour of preservation, Sustainable development , Scotland, Climate change , Sustainable development equations",
author = "Andrea Ross and Agne Zasinaite",
note = "The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1461452917710143",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "93--112",
journal = "Environmental Law Review",
issn = "1461-4529",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of presumptions and duties in sustainable development equations

T2 - promoting micro-renewables and preserving historic buildings

AU - Ross, Andrea

AU - Zasinaite, Agne

N1 - The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - Sustainable development provides a forum for sometimes complementary, but often conflicting, factors to be raised and the best solution found. As new challenges present themselves, they need to fit into our decision-making processes. This paper examines role of presumptions and duties in what it refers to as ‘sustainable development equations’. More specifically, it asks whether the regulatory regime for managing change in listed buildings is promoting and delivering the sustainable management of listed buildings. It does so by examining how the various legal and policy presumptions and duties set out above are used and prioritized by the courts, by Historic Environment Scotland (‘HES’) and local authorities in specific policy on managing change in listed buildings particularly in relation to micro-renewables projects and then in practice by local authorities in listed building consent decisions relating to solar panels. The paper concludes presumptions and duties are useful tools for ensuring certain factors and challenges are brought into sustainable development equations and given the appropriate status. However, in the context of listed buildings, the current balance is not capable of delivering or encouraging their sustainable management. Presumptions and duties are most useful when expressly part of particular regulatory regimes and where the policy that supports these sustainable development equations is sufficiently detailed to provide both regulators and the regulated with reassurance and certainty.

AB - Sustainable development provides a forum for sometimes complementary, but often conflicting, factors to be raised and the best solution found. As new challenges present themselves, they need to fit into our decision-making processes. This paper examines role of presumptions and duties in what it refers to as ‘sustainable development equations’. More specifically, it asks whether the regulatory regime for managing change in listed buildings is promoting and delivering the sustainable management of listed buildings. It does so by examining how the various legal and policy presumptions and duties set out above are used and prioritized by the courts, by Historic Environment Scotland (‘HES’) and local authorities in specific policy on managing change in listed buildings particularly in relation to micro-renewables projects and then in practice by local authorities in listed building consent decisions relating to solar panels. The paper concludes presumptions and duties are useful tools for ensuring certain factors and challenges are brought into sustainable development equations and given the appropriate status. However, in the context of listed buildings, the current balance is not capable of delivering or encouraging their sustainable management. Presumptions and duties are most useful when expressly part of particular regulatory regimes and where the policy that supports these sustainable development equations is sufficiently detailed to provide both regulators and the regulated with reassurance and certainty.

KW - Listed buildings

KW - Presumption in favour of preservation

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Scotland

KW - Climate change

KW - Sustainable development equations

U2 - 10.1177/1461452917710143

DO - 10.1177/1461452917710143

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 93

EP - 112

JO - Environmental Law Review

JF - Environmental Law Review

SN - 1461-4529

IS - 2

ER -