The value of mentorship in medical education

Faith Dalgaty, Greg Guthrie, Heather Walker, Kevin Stirling (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transition from senior medical student to working safely and effectively as a new junior doctor is one of the biggest challenges that a new graduate will face. In 2014 the General Medical Council published The state of medical education and practice in the UK, reporting that some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities. We classify these instances as a 'performance gap', describing occasions in clinical practice where an individual exceeds their performance capacity. The Medical Mentorship Programme addressed identified performance gaps through a structured curriculum of simulation-based education and facilitated clinical practice.

METHODS: Programme content was based on the experiences of the authors and their peers in graduating from their undergraduate training programme and becoming junior doctors. A questionnaire was disseminated to junior doctors in their first clinical rotation. The questionnaire asked doctors to describe instances where they experienced a performance gap. These data informed the development of the Medical Mentorship Programme. The effect of this programme was then evaluated via focus group discussion.

RESULTS: The Medical Mentorship Programme has been shown to be an effective conduit for supporting the transfer of learning needed to address performance gaps in students. The programme increased the confidence of students in preparation for clinical practice and allowed junior doctors to reflect on their professional development. The programme combined complementary teaching techniques - mentorship, simulation and direct clinical experience - to aid the professional development of both students and mentors. Some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-128
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Teacher
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date4 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Mentors
Medical Education
Students
Education
Focus Groups
Medical Students
Curriculum
Teaching

Keywords

  • Clinical competence
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Communication
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate
  • Humans
  • Mentors
  • Staff development
  • Students, Medical
  • Terminal care
  • Journal article

Cite this

Dalgaty, Faith ; Guthrie, Greg ; Walker, Heather ; Stirling, Kevin. / The value of mentorship in medical education. In: Clinical Teacher. 2017 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 124-128.
@article{27ba6932e1114986893105069be885d4,
title = "The value of mentorship in medical education",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The transition from senior medical student to working safely and effectively as a new junior doctor is one of the biggest challenges that a new graduate will face. In 2014 the General Medical Council published The state of medical education and practice in the UK, reporting that some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities. We classify these instances as a 'performance gap', describing occasions in clinical practice where an individual exceeds their performance capacity. The Medical Mentorship Programme addressed identified performance gaps through a structured curriculum of simulation-based education and facilitated clinical practice.METHODS: Programme content was based on the experiences of the authors and their peers in graduating from their undergraduate training programme and becoming junior doctors. A questionnaire was disseminated to junior doctors in their first clinical rotation. The questionnaire asked doctors to describe instances where they experienced a performance gap. These data informed the development of the Medical Mentorship Programme. The effect of this programme was then evaluated via focus group discussion.RESULTS: The Medical Mentorship Programme has been shown to be an effective conduit for supporting the transfer of learning needed to address performance gaps in students. The programme increased the confidence of students in preparation for clinical practice and allowed junior doctors to reflect on their professional development. The programme combined complementary teaching techniques - mentorship, simulation and direct clinical experience - to aid the professional development of both students and mentors. Some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities.",
keywords = "Clinical competence, Clinical decision-making, Communication, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Mentors, Staff development, Students, Medical, Terminal care, Journal article",
author = "Faith Dalgaty and Greg Guthrie and Heather Walker and Kevin Stirling",
note = "No funding",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/tct.12510",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "124--128",
journal = "Clinical Teacher",
issn = "1743-4971",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

The value of mentorship in medical education. / Dalgaty, Faith; Guthrie, Greg; Walker, Heather; Stirling, Kevin (Lead / Corresponding author).

In: Clinical Teacher, Vol. 14, No. 2, 04.2017, p. 124-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of mentorship in medical education

AU - Dalgaty, Faith

AU - Guthrie, Greg

AU - Walker, Heather

AU - Stirling, Kevin

N1 - No funding

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: The transition from senior medical student to working safely and effectively as a new junior doctor is one of the biggest challenges that a new graduate will face. In 2014 the General Medical Council published The state of medical education and practice in the UK, reporting that some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities. We classify these instances as a 'performance gap', describing occasions in clinical practice where an individual exceeds their performance capacity. The Medical Mentorship Programme addressed identified performance gaps through a structured curriculum of simulation-based education and facilitated clinical practice.METHODS: Programme content was based on the experiences of the authors and their peers in graduating from their undergraduate training programme and becoming junior doctors. A questionnaire was disseminated to junior doctors in their first clinical rotation. The questionnaire asked doctors to describe instances where they experienced a performance gap. These data informed the development of the Medical Mentorship Programme. The effect of this programme was then evaluated via focus group discussion.RESULTS: The Medical Mentorship Programme has been shown to be an effective conduit for supporting the transfer of learning needed to address performance gaps in students. The programme increased the confidence of students in preparation for clinical practice and allowed junior doctors to reflect on their professional development. The programme combined complementary teaching techniques - mentorship, simulation and direct clinical experience - to aid the professional development of both students and mentors. Some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities.

AB - BACKGROUND: The transition from senior medical student to working safely and effectively as a new junior doctor is one of the biggest challenges that a new graduate will face. In 2014 the General Medical Council published The state of medical education and practice in the UK, reporting that some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities. We classify these instances as a 'performance gap', describing occasions in clinical practice where an individual exceeds their performance capacity. The Medical Mentorship Programme addressed identified performance gaps through a structured curriculum of simulation-based education and facilitated clinical practice.METHODS: Programme content was based on the experiences of the authors and their peers in graduating from their undergraduate training programme and becoming junior doctors. A questionnaire was disseminated to junior doctors in their first clinical rotation. The questionnaire asked doctors to describe instances where they experienced a performance gap. These data informed the development of the Medical Mentorship Programme. The effect of this programme was then evaluated via focus group discussion.RESULTS: The Medical Mentorship Programme has been shown to be an effective conduit for supporting the transfer of learning needed to address performance gaps in students. The programme increased the confidence of students in preparation for clinical practice and allowed junior doctors to reflect on their professional development. The programme combined complementary teaching techniques - mentorship, simulation and direct clinical experience - to aid the professional development of both students and mentors. Some new doctors continue to struggle with increased responsibilities.

KW - Clinical competence

KW - Clinical decision-making

KW - Communication

KW - Education, Medical, Undergraduate

KW - Humans

KW - Mentors

KW - Staff development

KW - Students, Medical

KW - Terminal care

KW - Journal article

U2 - 10.1111/tct.12510

DO - 10.1111/tct.12510

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 124

EP - 128

JO - Clinical Teacher

JF - Clinical Teacher

SN - 1743-4971

IS - 2

ER -