Thoughts on attitude measurement

Norman Reid

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    80 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Attitude measurement has had a somewhat chequered history since the possibility of achieving it successfully was demonstrated by Thurstone in 1929. It has been an important area in science education, particularly in the context of falling uptakes in the physical sciences in many countries, and there have been many attempts to measure learner attitudes to explore why they were deserting studies in such subjects. This paper explores the place of attitude measurement in science education and traces the main approaches that have been developed. The place and nature of attitude scaling techniques is analysed and it is demonstrated that such techniques have many fundamental flaws. These weaknesses make such approaches unlikely to offer the kind of precision needed to take our understanding of attitude development forward in the context of science education. Alternative approaches are outlined and it is strongly suggested that science education research rejects such scaling techniques and moves forward to develop new approaches that can give the kind of detailed analysis which will prove to be positive and useful. This paper seeks to bring evidence from many sources together, to challenge many of the unquestioned assumptions behind the metholodogies used in many attitude-related studies today and to make a positive contribution in encouraging more appropriate methodologies to be adopted more widely
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-27
    Number of pages25
    JournalResearch in Science and Technological Education
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    attitude measurement
    science
    scaling
    education
    methodology
    history
    evidence

    Keywords

    • Attitude measurement
    • Science education

    Cite this

    Reid, Norman. / Thoughts on attitude measurement. In: Research in Science and Technological Education. 2006 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 3-27.
    @article{5df4ed6ea9f44f47b79f0e95b1afedb7,
    title = "Thoughts on attitude measurement",
    abstract = "Attitude measurement has had a somewhat chequered history since the possibility of achieving it successfully was demonstrated by Thurstone in 1929. It has been an important area in science education, particularly in the context of falling uptakes in the physical sciences in many countries, and there have been many attempts to measure learner attitudes to explore why they were deserting studies in such subjects. This paper explores the place of attitude measurement in science education and traces the main approaches that have been developed. The place and nature of attitude scaling techniques is analysed and it is demonstrated that such techniques have many fundamental flaws. These weaknesses make such approaches unlikely to offer the kind of precision needed to take our understanding of attitude development forward in the context of science education. Alternative approaches are outlined and it is strongly suggested that science education research rejects such scaling techniques and moves forward to develop new approaches that can give the kind of detailed analysis which will prove to be positive and useful. This paper seeks to bring evidence from many sources together, to challenge many of the unquestioned assumptions behind the metholodogies used in many attitude-related studies today and to make a positive contribution in encouraging more appropriate methodologies to be adopted more widely",
    keywords = "Attitude measurement, Science education",
    author = "Norman Reid",
    note = "dc.publisher: Routledge",
    year = "2006",
    doi = "10.1080/02635140500485332",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "3--27",
    journal = "Research in Science and Technological Education",
    issn = "0263-5143",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "1",

    }

    Thoughts on attitude measurement. / Reid, Norman.

    In: Research in Science and Technological Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2006, p. 3-27.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Thoughts on attitude measurement

    AU - Reid, Norman

    N1 - dc.publisher: Routledge

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - Attitude measurement has had a somewhat chequered history since the possibility of achieving it successfully was demonstrated by Thurstone in 1929. It has been an important area in science education, particularly in the context of falling uptakes in the physical sciences in many countries, and there have been many attempts to measure learner attitudes to explore why they were deserting studies in such subjects. This paper explores the place of attitude measurement in science education and traces the main approaches that have been developed. The place and nature of attitude scaling techniques is analysed and it is demonstrated that such techniques have many fundamental flaws. These weaknesses make such approaches unlikely to offer the kind of precision needed to take our understanding of attitude development forward in the context of science education. Alternative approaches are outlined and it is strongly suggested that science education research rejects such scaling techniques and moves forward to develop new approaches that can give the kind of detailed analysis which will prove to be positive and useful. This paper seeks to bring evidence from many sources together, to challenge many of the unquestioned assumptions behind the metholodogies used in many attitude-related studies today and to make a positive contribution in encouraging more appropriate methodologies to be adopted more widely

    AB - Attitude measurement has had a somewhat chequered history since the possibility of achieving it successfully was demonstrated by Thurstone in 1929. It has been an important area in science education, particularly in the context of falling uptakes in the physical sciences in many countries, and there have been many attempts to measure learner attitudes to explore why they were deserting studies in such subjects. This paper explores the place of attitude measurement in science education and traces the main approaches that have been developed. The place and nature of attitude scaling techniques is analysed and it is demonstrated that such techniques have many fundamental flaws. These weaknesses make such approaches unlikely to offer the kind of precision needed to take our understanding of attitude development forward in the context of science education. Alternative approaches are outlined and it is strongly suggested that science education research rejects such scaling techniques and moves forward to develop new approaches that can give the kind of detailed analysis which will prove to be positive and useful. This paper seeks to bring evidence from many sources together, to challenge many of the unquestioned assumptions behind the metholodogies used in many attitude-related studies today and to make a positive contribution in encouraging more appropriate methodologies to be adopted more widely

    KW - Attitude measurement

    KW - Science education

    U2 - 10.1080/02635140500485332

    DO - 10.1080/02635140500485332

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 3

    EP - 27

    JO - Research in Science and Technological Education

    JF - Research in Science and Technological Education

    SN - 0263-5143

    IS - 1

    ER -