Ticagrelor Compared with Clopidogrel in Patients with Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease

EUCLID Trial Steering Committee and Investigators, W. Schuyler Jones, Iris Baumgartner, William R. Hiatt, Gretchen Heizer, Michael S. Conte, Christopher J. White, Jeffrey S. Berger, Peter Held, Brian G. Katona, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Lars Norgren, Juuso Blomster, Marcus Millegård, Craig Reist, Manesh R. Patel, F. Gerry R. Fowkes (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease with a history of limb revascularization, the optimal antithrombotic regimen for long-term management is unknown.

Methods: The EUCLID trial (Examining Use of Ticagrelor In PAD) randomized 13 885 patients with peripheral artery disease to treatment with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Patients were enrolled based on an abnormal ankle-brachial index ≤0.80 or a previous lower extremity revascularization. This analysis focuses on the 7875 (57%) patients enrolled based on the previous lower extremity revascularization criterion. Patients could not be enrolled within 30 days of most recent revascularization, and patients with an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point was major bleeding.

Results: Patients with a previous revascularization had a mean age of 66 years, 73% were male, and the median baseline ankle-brachial index was 0.78. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization had similar rates of the primary composite end point (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.23, P=0.12) and statistically significantly higher rates of myocardial infarction (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.55, P=0.005) and acute limb ischemia (HR 4.23, 95% CI 2.86-6.25, P<0.001) when compared with patients enrolled based on ankle-brachial index criteria. No differences in ticagrelor- versus clopidogrel-treated patients were found for the primary efficacy end point (11.4% vs 11.3%; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88-1.15; P=0.90), all-cause mortality (9.2% vs 9.2%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.15; P=0.93), acute limb ischemia (2.5% vs 2.5%; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.36; P=0.84), or major bleeding (1.9% vs 1.8%; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83-1.59; P=0.41). The median duration of follow-up was ≈30 months.

Conclusions: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization for peripheral artery disease had higher rates of myocardial infarction and acute limb ischemia, with similar composite rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke when compared with patients enrolled based on the ankle-brachial index criterion. No significant differences were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for reduction of cardiovascular or acute limb events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-250
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation
Volume135
Issue number3
Early online date13 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • lower extremity revascularization
  • peripheral artery disease
  • ticagrelor
  • vascular intervention

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ticagrelor Compared with Clopidogrel in Patients with Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this