Time for Ontology? The Role of Ontological Time in Anticipation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
168 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this contribution, I will argue for an ontological understanding of time as temporality. This, however, implies that in a certain sense being is temporality, by which I mean that (1) on an ontological level temporality is nothing but the process of change, i.e. the dynamic aspect of being in its becoming, changing, and perishing, and (2) that concrete beings are not merely in time, but they are temporal. This leads to the conclusion that actual time is the process of change that becoming beings are, as well as the conclusion that reality is fundamentally temporal as argued by process metaphysicians like Alfred North Whitehead, Henri Bergson, Martin Heidegger, and Gilles Deleuze. The investigation begins with first establishing the methodological difficulties involved in thinking temporality as an ontological feature. In a second step, dynamic ontologies are introduced as the conceptual background best suited to think ontological temporality and their difference to event-ontologies is explained. Finally, the distinction between temporality and linear time is clarified. This introduction of temporality ends with some arguments for the existence of temporality that are inspired by Aristotle’s famous investigations into the nature of time. After having thus introduced temporality as an ontological feature and argued for the existence and relevance of it, its implications for our understanding of the dimensions of time and especially for anticipation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-47
Number of pages15
JournalAxiomathes
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date29 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Anticipation
  • Future
  • Past
  • Process philosophy
  • Temporal ontology

Cite this