Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England

Karen Barton (Lead / Corresponding author), Stephanie Chambers, Annie Anderson, Wendy L. Wrieden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
97 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. Recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences is limited. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. A period of 12 years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household-level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than in England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267 g/d; 99 % CI 259, 274 v. 298 g/d; 99 % CI 296, 301), P<0·001). Similarly, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower-income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest-income quintile was 65 g/d; 99 % CI 61, 69 in Scotland v. 58 g/day; 99 % CI 57, 60 in England, P<0·001, but similar in the highest-income quintile (58 g/d; 99 % CI 54, 61 v. 59 g/d; 99 % CI 58, 60, respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared with England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-226
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume120
Issue number2
Early online date27 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Scotland
England
Food
Diet
Health
Food Analysis
Vulnerable Populations
Vegetables
Population
Fruit
Economics
Education
Mortality

Keywords

  • England
  • Food consumption
  • Inequalities
  • Nutrient intakes
  • Scotland

Cite this

Barton, Karen ; Chambers, Stephanie ; Anderson, Annie ; Wrieden, Wendy L. / Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2018 ; Vol. 120, No. 2. pp. 220-226.
@article{23045444ef4a4cb2958ca7661e5fdcf2,
title = "Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England",
abstract = "Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. Recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences is limited. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. A period of 12 years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household-level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than in England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267 g/d; 99 {\%} CI 259, 274 v. 298 g/d; 99 {\%} CI 296, 301), P<0·001). Similarly, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower-income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest-income quintile was 65 g/d; 99 {\%} CI 61, 69 in Scotland v. 58 g/day; 99 {\%} CI 57, 60 in England, P<0·001, but similar in the highest-income quintile (58 g/d; 99 {\%} CI 54, 61 v. 59 g/d; 99 {\%} CI 58, 60, respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared with England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.",
keywords = "England, Food consumption, Inequalities, Nutrient intakes, Scotland",
author = "Karen Barton and Stephanie Chambers and Annie Anderson and Wrieden, {Wendy L.}",
note = "This work was supported by NHS Health Scotland (grant number 2014/15 RE007). NHS Health Scotland had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. SC was also supported by a Medical Research Council Strategic Award MC_PC_13027, and MRC Grants MC_UU_12017/12 and MC_UU_12017/14, and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates Grants SPHSU12 and SPHSU14.",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114518001435",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "220--226",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England. / Barton, Karen (Lead / Corresponding author); Chambers, Stephanie; Anderson, Annie; Wrieden, Wendy L.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 120, No. 2, 28.07.2018, p. 220-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to address the double inequality of differences in dietary intake between Scotland and England

AU - Barton, Karen

AU - Chambers, Stephanie

AU - Anderson, Annie

AU - Wrieden, Wendy L.

N1 - This work was supported by NHS Health Scotland (grant number 2014/15 RE007). NHS Health Scotland had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. SC was also supported by a Medical Research Council Strategic Award MC_PC_13027, and MRC Grants MC_UU_12017/12 and MC_UU_12017/14, and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates Grants SPHSU12 and SPHSU14.

PY - 2018/7/28

Y1 - 2018/7/28

N2 - Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. Recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences is limited. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. A period of 12 years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household-level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than in England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267 g/d; 99 % CI 259, 274 v. 298 g/d; 99 % CI 296, 301), P<0·001). Similarly, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower-income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest-income quintile was 65 g/d; 99 % CI 61, 69 in Scotland v. 58 g/day; 99 % CI 57, 60 in England, P<0·001, but similar in the highest-income quintile (58 g/d; 99 % CI 54, 61 v. 59 g/d; 99 % CI 58, 60, respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared with England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.

AB - Geographical disparities in health outcomes have been evident across the UK for decades. Recent analysis on the dietary differences between Scotland and England that might go some way to explain these health differences is limited. This study aimed to assess whether, and to what degree, aspects of diet and nutrition differ between Scottish and English populations, specifically between those with similar household incomes. A period of 12 years of UK food purchase data (2001-2012) were pooled and used to estimate household-level consumption data for Scotland and England. Population mean food consumption and nutrient intakes were estimated, adjusting for known confounders (year, age of household reference person, age they left full-time education and income). Comparison was also made within equivalised income quintiles. Analysis showed that the foods and nutrients that should be increased in the diet (highlighted in the Scottish Dietary Goals) were lower in Scotland than in England (e.g. fruit and vegetables 267 g/d; 99 % CI 259, 274 v. 298 g/d; 99 % CI 296, 301), P<0·001). Similarly, foods and drinks linked with poor health outcomes were higher in Scotland. These regional inequalities in diet were even more pronounced in the lower-income groups (e.g. red and processed meat consumption in the lowest-income quintile was 65 g/d; 99 % CI 61, 69 in Scotland v. 58 g/day; 99 % CI 57, 60 in England, P<0·001, but similar in the highest-income quintile (58 g/d; 99 % CI 54, 61 v. 59 g/d; 99 % CI 58, 60, respectively). A poorer diet in Scotland compared with England, particularly among disadvantaged groups, may contribute to differences in excess mortality between countries.

KW - England

KW - Food consumption

KW - Inequalities

KW - Nutrient intakes

KW - Scotland

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049660367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114518001435

DO - 10.1017/S0007114518001435

M3 - Article

C2 - 29947325

VL - 120

SP - 220

EP - 226

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 2

ER -