Abstract
Computer tools are increasingly used to support the analysis of argumentative texts. Generic support for argumentation analysis is helpful, but catering to the requirements of specific theoretical approaches has additional advantages. Although the pragma-dialectical method of analyzing argumentative texts is widely used, no dedicated computational support tools exist. An outline is presented for the development of such tools, that starts with the formal approximation of the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 |
| Editors | Laura Benacquista, Pat Bondy |
| Place of Publication | Ontario, Canada |
| Publisher | University of Windsor |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Volume | 11 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 2371-8323 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) - Windsor, Canada Duration: 18 May 2016 → 21 May 2016 https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/?utm_source=scholar.uwindsor.ca%2Fossaarchive%2FOSSA11%2Fpapersandcommentaries%2F134&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages |
Conference
| Conference | 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | Windsor |
| Period | 18/05/16 → 21/05/16 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- analysis
- computational argumentation theory
- computer support
- critical discussion
- formalization
- pragma-dialectics
- reconstruction