Trainee and supervisor experience of the Academic Foundation Programme

Daniel Darbyshire (Lead / Corresponding author), Paul Baker, Steven Agius, Sean McAleer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) is often the initial step along the Integrated Academic Training pathway in the UK. It is relatively new and research as to its effectiveness is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the AFP in terms of its impact on academic career aspirations and to explore trainees' expectations and experience of the programme and investigate the enablers and barriers to success.

Method: Seven supervisors of Academic Foundation trainees were interviewed over a 5-month period in 2014. AFP trainees' views were sought by way of an online questionnaire that covered six areas: demographics, expectations, academic time, experience, research and achievements.

Results: Thirty-four trainees completed online questionnaires. The majority of trainees (94%) did not proceed directly along the Integrated Academic Training pathway to complete Academic Clinical Fellowships, but those who applied to do so were often successful (nine applicants, six successful). Free-text comments revealed an expectation of a more course-like structure to the programme, this is in contrast to the authentic experience of clinical academia, along with its associated challenges, that some of the supervisors reported. The importance of planning and preparation for success was a recurring theme from the supervisor interviews.

Conclusions: The programme is achieving some success in encouraging academic careers. There are several areas that can be improved. Improving the availability of information and guidance for supervisors and facilitating Academic Foundation Doctors to network are both feasible changes that could lead to improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-51
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

trainee
experience
academic career
time experience
career aspiration
questionnaire
applicant
planning
interview

Keywords

  • Academic careers
  • Funding
  • Medical careers
  • Mentoring
  • Promotion
  • Qualitative
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Survey
  • Training

Cite this

@article{c7f676cf22d341aa8e6a8d600767b4b3,
title = "Trainee and supervisor experience of the Academic Foundation Programme",
abstract = "Background: The Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) is often the initial step along the Integrated Academic Training pathway in the UK. It is relatively new and research as to its effectiveness is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the AFP in terms of its impact on academic career aspirations and to explore trainees' expectations and experience of the programme and investigate the enablers and barriers to success.Method: Seven supervisors of Academic Foundation trainees were interviewed over a 5-month period in 2014. AFP trainees' views were sought by way of an online questionnaire that covered six areas: demographics, expectations, academic time, experience, research and achievements.Results: Thirty-four trainees completed online questionnaires. The majority of trainees (94{\%}) did not proceed directly along the Integrated Academic Training pathway to complete Academic Clinical Fellowships, but those who applied to do so were often successful (nine applicants, six successful). Free-text comments revealed an expectation of a more course-like structure to the programme, this is in contrast to the authentic experience of clinical academia, along with its associated challenges, that some of the supervisors reported. The importance of planning and preparation for success was a recurring theme from the supervisor interviews.Conclusions: The programme is achieving some success in encouraging academic careers. There are several areas that can be improved. Improving the availability of information and guidance for supervisors and facilitating Academic Foundation Doctors to network are both feasible changes that could lead to improvement.",
keywords = "Academic careers, Funding, Medical careers, Mentoring, Promotion, Qualitative, Recruitment, Retention, Survey, Training",
author = "Daniel Darbyshire and Paul Baker and Steven Agius and Sean McAleer",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.4997/JRCPE.2019.111",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "43--51",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "1478-2715",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
number = "1",

}

Trainee and supervisor experience of the Academic Foundation Programme. / Darbyshire, Daniel (Lead / Corresponding author); Baker, Paul; Agius, Steven; McAleer, Sean.

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 49, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 43-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trainee and supervisor experience of the Academic Foundation Programme

AU - Darbyshire, Daniel

AU - Baker, Paul

AU - Agius, Steven

AU - McAleer, Sean

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Background: The Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) is often the initial step along the Integrated Academic Training pathway in the UK. It is relatively new and research as to its effectiveness is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the AFP in terms of its impact on academic career aspirations and to explore trainees' expectations and experience of the programme and investigate the enablers and barriers to success.Method: Seven supervisors of Academic Foundation trainees were interviewed over a 5-month period in 2014. AFP trainees' views were sought by way of an online questionnaire that covered six areas: demographics, expectations, academic time, experience, research and achievements.Results: Thirty-four trainees completed online questionnaires. The majority of trainees (94%) did not proceed directly along the Integrated Academic Training pathway to complete Academic Clinical Fellowships, but those who applied to do so were often successful (nine applicants, six successful). Free-text comments revealed an expectation of a more course-like structure to the programme, this is in contrast to the authentic experience of clinical academia, along with its associated challenges, that some of the supervisors reported. The importance of planning and preparation for success was a recurring theme from the supervisor interviews.Conclusions: The programme is achieving some success in encouraging academic careers. There are several areas that can be improved. Improving the availability of information and guidance for supervisors and facilitating Academic Foundation Doctors to network are both feasible changes that could lead to improvement.

AB - Background: The Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) is often the initial step along the Integrated Academic Training pathway in the UK. It is relatively new and research as to its effectiveness is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the AFP in terms of its impact on academic career aspirations and to explore trainees' expectations and experience of the programme and investigate the enablers and barriers to success.Method: Seven supervisors of Academic Foundation trainees were interviewed over a 5-month period in 2014. AFP trainees' views were sought by way of an online questionnaire that covered six areas: demographics, expectations, academic time, experience, research and achievements.Results: Thirty-four trainees completed online questionnaires. The majority of trainees (94%) did not proceed directly along the Integrated Academic Training pathway to complete Academic Clinical Fellowships, but those who applied to do so were often successful (nine applicants, six successful). Free-text comments revealed an expectation of a more course-like structure to the programme, this is in contrast to the authentic experience of clinical academia, along with its associated challenges, that some of the supervisors reported. The importance of planning and preparation for success was a recurring theme from the supervisor interviews.Conclusions: The programme is achieving some success in encouraging academic careers. There are several areas that can be improved. Improving the availability of information and guidance for supervisors and facilitating Academic Foundation Doctors to network are both feasible changes that could lead to improvement.

KW - Academic careers

KW - Funding

KW - Medical careers

KW - Mentoring

KW - Promotion

KW - Qualitative

KW - Recruitment

KW - Retention

KW - Survey

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062593482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4997/JRCPE.2019.111

DO - 10.4997/JRCPE.2019.111

M3 - Article

C2 - 30838993

VL - 49

SP - 43

EP - 51

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 1478-2715

IS - 1

ER -