Transitional justice and the rule of law: the perfect couple or awkward bedfellows?

Padraig McAuliffe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The dominant scholarly assumptions are that transitional justice is a pre-condition for establishing a rule of law-based society after conflict or repression, and that transitional justice and the rule of law are mutually-reinforcing phenomena. Though the imperfect conditions of transition invariably give rise to difficult dilemmas over justice with imperfect solutions, literature in the field has downplayed or ignored the long-term impact on the administration of justice in the transitional state of the tendency of transitional responses to past human rights abuses to readily depart from the core values we associate with the rule of law. As noted in Teitel's study of the rule of law's relationship to transitional justice, this tendency is manifest where criminal accountability is suspended so as not to imperil the transition or where due process is circumvented in the idealistic and over-zealous pursuit of idealized transitional dividends through trial, truth commission and reparation. As transitional justice scholarship moves from moral-philosophical and jurisprudential preoccupations to greater empirical and interdisciplinary analysis, the sweeping normative assumptions of the past are increasingly being questioned. The article argues that though such acts or omissions may be excused by the exigencies of transition and contribute to the development of the conditions where the rule of law can prosper, liberalizing societies are better served by understanding these deviations from what we understand as full legality as deviations and not as manifestations of a fluid and contingent transitional rule of law.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)127-154
    Number of pages28
    JournalHague Journal on the Rule of Law
    Volume2
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

    Fingerprint

    constitutional state
    justice
    administration of justice
    reparation
    legality
    repression
    human rights
    abuse
    responsibility
    society
    Values

    Keywords

    • Transitional justice
    • Accountability
    • Teitel
    • Transition
    • Amnesty

    Cite this

    @article{7de9fd34dfa64d97a5c4af42c8e0a692,
    title = "Transitional justice and the rule of law: the perfect couple or awkward bedfellows?",
    abstract = "The dominant scholarly assumptions are that transitional justice is a pre-condition for establishing a rule of law-based society after conflict or repression, and that transitional justice and the rule of law are mutually-reinforcing phenomena. Though the imperfect conditions of transition invariably give rise to difficult dilemmas over justice with imperfect solutions, literature in the field has downplayed or ignored the long-term impact on the administration of justice in the transitional state of the tendency of transitional responses to past human rights abuses to readily depart from the core values we associate with the rule of law. As noted in Teitel's study of the rule of law's relationship to transitional justice, this tendency is manifest where criminal accountability is suspended so as not to imperil the transition or where due process is circumvented in the idealistic and over-zealous pursuit of idealized transitional dividends through trial, truth commission and reparation. As transitional justice scholarship moves from moral-philosophical and jurisprudential preoccupations to greater empirical and interdisciplinary analysis, the sweeping normative assumptions of the past are increasingly being questioned. The article argues that though such acts or omissions may be excused by the exigencies of transition and contribute to the development of the conditions where the rule of law can prosper, liberalizing societies are better served by understanding these deviations from what we understand as full legality as deviations and not as manifestations of a fluid and contingent transitional rule of law.",
    keywords = "Transitional justice, Accountability, Teitel, Transition, Amnesty",
    author = "Padraig McAuliffe",
    note = "dc.publisher: T.M.C. Asser Press",
    year = "2010",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1017/S1876404510200015",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "127--154",
    journal = "Hague Journal on the Rule of Law",
    issn = "1876-4045",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "2",

    }

    Transitional justice and the rule of law: the perfect couple or awkward bedfellows? / McAuliffe, Padraig.

    In: Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 2, No. 2, 09.2010, p. 127-154.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Transitional justice and the rule of law: the perfect couple or awkward bedfellows?

    AU - McAuliffe, Padraig

    N1 - dc.publisher: T.M.C. Asser Press

    PY - 2010/9

    Y1 - 2010/9

    N2 - The dominant scholarly assumptions are that transitional justice is a pre-condition for establishing a rule of law-based society after conflict or repression, and that transitional justice and the rule of law are mutually-reinforcing phenomena. Though the imperfect conditions of transition invariably give rise to difficult dilemmas over justice with imperfect solutions, literature in the field has downplayed or ignored the long-term impact on the administration of justice in the transitional state of the tendency of transitional responses to past human rights abuses to readily depart from the core values we associate with the rule of law. As noted in Teitel's study of the rule of law's relationship to transitional justice, this tendency is manifest where criminal accountability is suspended so as not to imperil the transition or where due process is circumvented in the idealistic and over-zealous pursuit of idealized transitional dividends through trial, truth commission and reparation. As transitional justice scholarship moves from moral-philosophical and jurisprudential preoccupations to greater empirical and interdisciplinary analysis, the sweeping normative assumptions of the past are increasingly being questioned. The article argues that though such acts or omissions may be excused by the exigencies of transition and contribute to the development of the conditions where the rule of law can prosper, liberalizing societies are better served by understanding these deviations from what we understand as full legality as deviations and not as manifestations of a fluid and contingent transitional rule of law.

    AB - The dominant scholarly assumptions are that transitional justice is a pre-condition for establishing a rule of law-based society after conflict or repression, and that transitional justice and the rule of law are mutually-reinforcing phenomena. Though the imperfect conditions of transition invariably give rise to difficult dilemmas over justice with imperfect solutions, literature in the field has downplayed or ignored the long-term impact on the administration of justice in the transitional state of the tendency of transitional responses to past human rights abuses to readily depart from the core values we associate with the rule of law. As noted in Teitel's study of the rule of law's relationship to transitional justice, this tendency is manifest where criminal accountability is suspended so as not to imperil the transition or where due process is circumvented in the idealistic and over-zealous pursuit of idealized transitional dividends through trial, truth commission and reparation. As transitional justice scholarship moves from moral-philosophical and jurisprudential preoccupations to greater empirical and interdisciplinary analysis, the sweeping normative assumptions of the past are increasingly being questioned. The article argues that though such acts or omissions may be excused by the exigencies of transition and contribute to the development of the conditions where the rule of law can prosper, liberalizing societies are better served by understanding these deviations from what we understand as full legality as deviations and not as manifestations of a fluid and contingent transitional rule of law.

    KW - Transitional justice

    KW - Accountability

    KW - Teitel

    KW - Transition

    KW - Amnesty

    U2 - 10.1017/S1876404510200015

    DO - 10.1017/S1876404510200015

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 127

    EP - 154

    JO - Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

    JF - Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

    SN - 1876-4045

    IS - 2

    ER -