Translating Wigmore diagrams

Glenn Rowe, Chris Reed

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the early 20th century. J.H. Wigmore described a new method for and laying out arguments in legal cases. His proposal was the first system of argument diagramming, and it is still in use in jurisprudence today. Wigmore diagrams offer a rich ontology of argumentation concepts which in some respects are close to ideas in other, more modern systems of argument analysis and argument diagramming - whilst in other areas, is much richer and more specific than alternatives. The features of Wigmore analyses might reasonably be expected to contribute to modern, computational approaches to argument, both in the legal domain and more broadly. This paper explores some of the key issues in representing Wigmore analyses and translating between them and other systems of analysis such as those founded upon Toulmin models and scheme-based models.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationComputational Models of Argument
    Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of COMMA 2006
    EditorsPaul E. Dunne, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
    Place of PublicationAmsterdam
    PublisherIOS Press
    Pages171-182
    Number of pages12
    ISBN (Print)9781586036522
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    Event1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument - University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Duration: 11 Sep 200612 Sep 2006
    http://www.comma-conf.org/

    Publication series

    NameFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications
    PublisherIOS Press
    Volume144

    Conference

    Conference1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument
    Abbreviated titleCOMMA 2006
    CountryUnited Kingdom
    CityLiverpool
    Period11/09/0612/09/06
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Argument diagramming
    • Argument interchange
    • Argumentation schemes
    • Legal argument
    • Wigmore Diagrams

    Cite this

    Rowe, G., & Reed, C. (2006). Translating Wigmore diagrams. In P. E. Dunne, & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006 (pp. 171-182). (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 144). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    Rowe, Glenn ; Reed, Chris. / Translating Wigmore diagrams. Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. editor / Paul E. Dunne ; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2006. pp. 171-182 (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications).
    @inproceedings{66e1380235144492ae1c99c93e04cac6,
    title = "Translating Wigmore diagrams",
    abstract = "In the early 20th century. J.H. Wigmore described a new method for and laying out arguments in legal cases. His proposal was the first system of argument diagramming, and it is still in use in jurisprudence today. Wigmore diagrams offer a rich ontology of argumentation concepts which in some respects are close to ideas in other, more modern systems of argument analysis and argument diagramming - whilst in other areas, is much richer and more specific than alternatives. The features of Wigmore analyses might reasonably be expected to contribute to modern, computational approaches to argument, both in the legal domain and more broadly. This paper explores some of the key issues in representing Wigmore analyses and translating between them and other systems of analysis such as those founded upon Toulmin models and scheme-based models.",
    keywords = "Argument diagramming, Argument interchange, Argumentation schemes, Legal argument, Wigmore Diagrams",
    author = "Glenn Rowe and Chris Reed",
    year = "2006",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781586036522",
    series = "Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications",
    publisher = "IOS Press",
    pages = "171--182",
    editor = "Dunne, {Paul E.} and Bench-Capon, {Trevor J. M.}",
    booktitle = "Computational Models of Argument",
    address = "Netherlands",

    }

    Rowe, G & Reed, C 2006, Translating Wigmore diagrams. in PE Dunne & TJM Bench-Capon (eds), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol. 144, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 171-182, 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument , Liverpool, United Kingdom, 11/09/06.

    Translating Wigmore diagrams. / Rowe, Glenn; Reed, Chris.

    Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. ed. / Paul E. Dunne; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Amsterdam : IOS Press, 2006. p. 171-182 (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications; Vol. 144).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Translating Wigmore diagrams

    AU - Rowe, Glenn

    AU - Reed, Chris

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - In the early 20th century. J.H. Wigmore described a new method for and laying out arguments in legal cases. His proposal was the first system of argument diagramming, and it is still in use in jurisprudence today. Wigmore diagrams offer a rich ontology of argumentation concepts which in some respects are close to ideas in other, more modern systems of argument analysis and argument diagramming - whilst in other areas, is much richer and more specific than alternatives. The features of Wigmore analyses might reasonably be expected to contribute to modern, computational approaches to argument, both in the legal domain and more broadly. This paper explores some of the key issues in representing Wigmore analyses and translating between them and other systems of analysis such as those founded upon Toulmin models and scheme-based models.

    AB - In the early 20th century. J.H. Wigmore described a new method for and laying out arguments in legal cases. His proposal was the first system of argument diagramming, and it is still in use in jurisprudence today. Wigmore diagrams offer a rich ontology of argumentation concepts which in some respects are close to ideas in other, more modern systems of argument analysis and argument diagramming - whilst in other areas, is much richer and more specific than alternatives. The features of Wigmore analyses might reasonably be expected to contribute to modern, computational approaches to argument, both in the legal domain and more broadly. This paper explores some of the key issues in representing Wigmore analyses and translating between them and other systems of analysis such as those founded upon Toulmin models and scheme-based models.

    KW - Argument diagramming

    KW - Argument interchange

    KW - Argumentation schemes

    KW - Legal argument

    KW - Wigmore Diagrams

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9781586036522

    T3 - Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications

    SP - 171

    EP - 182

    BT - Computational Models of Argument

    A2 - Dunne, Paul E.

    A2 - Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M.

    PB - IOS Press

    CY - Amsterdam

    ER -

    Rowe G, Reed C. Translating Wigmore diagrams. In Dunne PE, Bench-Capon TJM, editors, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 2006. p. 171-182. (Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications).