Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task

Benjamin W. Tatler, Samuel B. Hutton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The antisaccade task requires participants to inhibit the reflexive tendency to look at a sudden onset target and instead direct their gaze to the opposite hemifield. As such it provides a convenient tool with which to investigate the cognitive and neural systems that support goal-directed behaviour. Recent models of cognitive control suggest that antisaccade performance on a single trial should vary as a function of the outcome (correct antisaccade or erroneous prosaccade) of the previous trial. In addition, repetition priming effects suggest that the spatial location of the target on the previous trial may also influence current trial performance. Thus an analysis of contingency effects in antisaccade performance may provide new insights into the factors that influence the monitoring and modulation of the antisaccade task and other ongoing behaviours. Using a multilevel modelling analysis we explored previous trial effects on current trial performance in a large antisaccade dataset. We found (1) repetition priming effects following correct antisaccades; (2) contrary to models of cognitive control antisaccade error rates were increased on trials following an error, suggesting that failures to adequately maintain the task goal can persist across more than one trial; and (3) current trial latencies varied according to the previous trial outcome (correct antisaccade, slowly corrected error or rapidly corrected error). These results are discussed in terms of current models of antisaccade performance and cognitive control and further demonstrate the utility of multilevel modelling for analysing antisaccade data.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)387-396
    Number of pages10
    JournalExperimental Brain Research
    Volume179
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Repetition Priming
    Multilevel Analysis

    Keywords

    • Saccades
    • Attention
    • Intention
    • Memory-short term
    • Inhibition (psychology)

    Cite this

    Tatler, Benjamin W. ; Hutton, Samuel B. / Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2007 ; Vol. 179, No. 3. pp. 387-396.
    @article{35d0051377214ebe892ac905604e701b,
    title = "Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task",
    abstract = "The antisaccade task requires participants to inhibit the reflexive tendency to look at a sudden onset target and instead direct their gaze to the opposite hemifield. As such it provides a convenient tool with which to investigate the cognitive and neural systems that support goal-directed behaviour. Recent models of cognitive control suggest that antisaccade performance on a single trial should vary as a function of the outcome (correct antisaccade or erroneous prosaccade) of the previous trial. In addition, repetition priming effects suggest that the spatial location of the target on the previous trial may also influence current trial performance. Thus an analysis of contingency effects in antisaccade performance may provide new insights into the factors that influence the monitoring and modulation of the antisaccade task and other ongoing behaviours. Using a multilevel modelling analysis we explored previous trial effects on current trial performance in a large antisaccade dataset. We found (1) repetition priming effects following correct antisaccades; (2) contrary to models of cognitive control antisaccade error rates were increased on trials following an error, suggesting that failures to adequately maintain the task goal can persist across more than one trial; and (3) current trial latencies varied according to the previous trial outcome (correct antisaccade, slowly corrected error or rapidly corrected error). These results are discussed in terms of current models of antisaccade performance and cognitive control and further demonstrate the utility of multilevel modelling for analysing antisaccade data.",
    keywords = "Saccades, Attention, Intention, Memory-short term, Inhibition (psychology)",
    author = "Tatler, {Benjamin W.} and Hutton, {Samuel B.}",
    note = "dc.publisher: Springer Verlag",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1007/s00221-006-0799-6",
    language = "English",
    volume = "179",
    pages = "387--396",
    journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
    issn = "0014-4819",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "3",

    }

    Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task. / Tatler, Benjamin W.; Hutton, Samuel B.

    In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 179, No. 3, 2007, p. 387-396.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task

    AU - Tatler, Benjamin W.

    AU - Hutton, Samuel B.

    N1 - dc.publisher: Springer Verlag

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - The antisaccade task requires participants to inhibit the reflexive tendency to look at a sudden onset target and instead direct their gaze to the opposite hemifield. As such it provides a convenient tool with which to investigate the cognitive and neural systems that support goal-directed behaviour. Recent models of cognitive control suggest that antisaccade performance on a single trial should vary as a function of the outcome (correct antisaccade or erroneous prosaccade) of the previous trial. In addition, repetition priming effects suggest that the spatial location of the target on the previous trial may also influence current trial performance. Thus an analysis of contingency effects in antisaccade performance may provide new insights into the factors that influence the monitoring and modulation of the antisaccade task and other ongoing behaviours. Using a multilevel modelling analysis we explored previous trial effects on current trial performance in a large antisaccade dataset. We found (1) repetition priming effects following correct antisaccades; (2) contrary to models of cognitive control antisaccade error rates were increased on trials following an error, suggesting that failures to adequately maintain the task goal can persist across more than one trial; and (3) current trial latencies varied according to the previous trial outcome (correct antisaccade, slowly corrected error or rapidly corrected error). These results are discussed in terms of current models of antisaccade performance and cognitive control and further demonstrate the utility of multilevel modelling for analysing antisaccade data.

    AB - The antisaccade task requires participants to inhibit the reflexive tendency to look at a sudden onset target and instead direct their gaze to the opposite hemifield. As such it provides a convenient tool with which to investigate the cognitive and neural systems that support goal-directed behaviour. Recent models of cognitive control suggest that antisaccade performance on a single trial should vary as a function of the outcome (correct antisaccade or erroneous prosaccade) of the previous trial. In addition, repetition priming effects suggest that the spatial location of the target on the previous trial may also influence current trial performance. Thus an analysis of contingency effects in antisaccade performance may provide new insights into the factors that influence the monitoring and modulation of the antisaccade task and other ongoing behaviours. Using a multilevel modelling analysis we explored previous trial effects on current trial performance in a large antisaccade dataset. We found (1) repetition priming effects following correct antisaccades; (2) contrary to models of cognitive control antisaccade error rates were increased on trials following an error, suggesting that failures to adequately maintain the task goal can persist across more than one trial; and (3) current trial latencies varied according to the previous trial outcome (correct antisaccade, slowly corrected error or rapidly corrected error). These results are discussed in terms of current models of antisaccade performance and cognitive control and further demonstrate the utility of multilevel modelling for analysing antisaccade data.

    KW - Saccades

    KW - Attention

    KW - Intention

    KW - Memory-short term

    KW - Inhibition (psychology)

    U2 - 10.1007/s00221-006-0799-6

    DO - 10.1007/s00221-006-0799-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 179

    SP - 387

    EP - 396

    JO - Experimental Brain Research

    JF - Experimental Brain Research

    SN - 0014-4819

    IS - 3

    ER -