Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effects of two computer based decision aids on decisional conflict and mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous caesarean section.
Design: Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006.
Setting: Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland.
Participants: 742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at =37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded.
Interventions: Usual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis: mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher.
Main outcome measures: Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery.
Results: Women in the information programme (adjusted difference -6.2, 95% confidence interval -8.7 to -3.7) and the decision analysis (-4.0, -6.5 to -1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups.
Conclusions: Decision aids can help women who have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section.
Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722.
Design: Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006.
Setting: Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland.
Participants: 742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at =37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded.
Interventions: Usual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis: mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher.
Main outcome measures: Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery.
Results: Women in the information programme (adjusted difference -6.2, 95% confidence interval -8.7 to -3.7) and the decision analysis (-4.0, -6.5 to -1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups.
Conclusions: Decision aids can help women who have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section.
Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1305-1309 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | BMJ |
| Volume | 334 |
| Issue number | 7607 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2007 |
