UN Peace-Building, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in East Timor

The Limits of Institutional Responses to Political Questions

Padraig McAuliffe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    186 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A series of UN peace-building missions have taken the leading role in reconstructing the rule of law in East Timor, most notably through the hybridised Special Panels trials from 2000 to 2005 and ongoing hybridised participation in prosecution and judging in the years since then. While UN peace-building doctrine place great faith in transfusions of international expertise in the institutions of justice to secure their autonomy, the experience in East Timor has been one of consistent governmental interference to restrain politically sensitive prosecutions and systematic pardon of those convicted of committing crimes of political violence. Beginning with the thwarted prosecution of Indonesian generals accused of crimes against humanity before the Special Panels, and moving on to consider episodes of prosecutorial interference and systematic pardon in trials dealing with crimes committed during serious civil unrest in 2006 and attempted assassinations of the President and Prime Minister in 2008, this article examines the UN's ongoing failure to secure the autonomy of the judicial institutions it is mandated to assist. It cites a preoccupation on the part of the UN with the institutional aspects of the rule of law which has been emphasised at the expense of the more contentious cultural and behavioural aspects of the rule of law at a political level which are essential if the institutions of justice are to operate independently.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)103-135
    Number of pages22
    JournalNetherlands International Law Review
    Volume58
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2011

    Fingerprint

    East-Timor
    constitutional state
    UNO
    peace
    prosecution
    justice
    offense
    attempted assassination
    interference
    autonomy
    political violence
    accused
    minister
    faith
    doctrine
    expertise
    president
    participation
    experience

    Keywords

    • East Timor
    • Peace-building
    • rule of law

    Cite this

    @article{c961ca4db5e443bfab46817cce29187e,
    title = "UN Peace-Building, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in East Timor: The Limits of Institutional Responses to Political Questions",
    abstract = "A series of UN peace-building missions have taken the leading role in reconstructing the rule of law in East Timor, most notably through the hybridised Special Panels trials from 2000 to 2005 and ongoing hybridised participation in prosecution and judging in the years since then. While UN peace-building doctrine place great faith in transfusions of international expertise in the institutions of justice to secure their autonomy, the experience in East Timor has been one of consistent governmental interference to restrain politically sensitive prosecutions and systematic pardon of those convicted of committing crimes of political violence. Beginning with the thwarted prosecution of Indonesian generals accused of crimes against humanity before the Special Panels, and moving on to consider episodes of prosecutorial interference and systematic pardon in trials dealing with crimes committed during serious civil unrest in 2006 and attempted assassinations of the President and Prime Minister in 2008, this article examines the UN's ongoing failure to secure the autonomy of the judicial institutions it is mandated to assist. It cites a preoccupation on the part of the UN with the institutional aspects of the rule of law which has been emphasised at the expense of the more contentious cultural and behavioural aspects of the rule of law at a political level which are essential if the institutions of justice are to operate independently.",
    keywords = "East Timor, Peace-building, rule of law",
    author = "Padraig McAuliffe",
    year = "2011",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1017/S0165070X11100042",
    language = "English",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "103--135",
    journal = "Netherlands International Law Review",
    issn = "0165-070X",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "1",

    }

    UN Peace-Building, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in East Timor : The Limits of Institutional Responses to Political Questions. / McAuliffe, Padraig.

    In: Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, 05.2011, p. 103-135.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - UN Peace-Building, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in East Timor

    T2 - The Limits of Institutional Responses to Political Questions

    AU - McAuliffe, Padraig

    PY - 2011/5

    Y1 - 2011/5

    N2 - A series of UN peace-building missions have taken the leading role in reconstructing the rule of law in East Timor, most notably through the hybridised Special Panels trials from 2000 to 2005 and ongoing hybridised participation in prosecution and judging in the years since then. While UN peace-building doctrine place great faith in transfusions of international expertise in the institutions of justice to secure their autonomy, the experience in East Timor has been one of consistent governmental interference to restrain politically sensitive prosecutions and systematic pardon of those convicted of committing crimes of political violence. Beginning with the thwarted prosecution of Indonesian generals accused of crimes against humanity before the Special Panels, and moving on to consider episodes of prosecutorial interference and systematic pardon in trials dealing with crimes committed during serious civil unrest in 2006 and attempted assassinations of the President and Prime Minister in 2008, this article examines the UN's ongoing failure to secure the autonomy of the judicial institutions it is mandated to assist. It cites a preoccupation on the part of the UN with the institutional aspects of the rule of law which has been emphasised at the expense of the more contentious cultural and behavioural aspects of the rule of law at a political level which are essential if the institutions of justice are to operate independently.

    AB - A series of UN peace-building missions have taken the leading role in reconstructing the rule of law in East Timor, most notably through the hybridised Special Panels trials from 2000 to 2005 and ongoing hybridised participation in prosecution and judging in the years since then. While UN peace-building doctrine place great faith in transfusions of international expertise in the institutions of justice to secure their autonomy, the experience in East Timor has been one of consistent governmental interference to restrain politically sensitive prosecutions and systematic pardon of those convicted of committing crimes of political violence. Beginning with the thwarted prosecution of Indonesian generals accused of crimes against humanity before the Special Panels, and moving on to consider episodes of prosecutorial interference and systematic pardon in trials dealing with crimes committed during serious civil unrest in 2006 and attempted assassinations of the President and Prime Minister in 2008, this article examines the UN's ongoing failure to secure the autonomy of the judicial institutions it is mandated to assist. It cites a preoccupation on the part of the UN with the institutional aspects of the rule of law which has been emphasised at the expense of the more contentious cultural and behavioural aspects of the rule of law at a political level which are essential if the institutions of justice are to operate independently.

    KW - East Timor

    KW - Peace-building

    KW - rule of law

    U2 - 10.1017/S0165070X11100042

    DO - 10.1017/S0165070X11100042

    M3 - Article

    VL - 58

    SP - 103

    EP - 135

    JO - Netherlands International Law Review

    JF - Netherlands International Law Review

    SN - 0165-070X

    IS - 1

    ER -